Editorial: Troubling allegationsAs the Sept. 11 Commission explores the reasons for America's vulnerability on that dark day, one would hope its hindsight has better than 20-20 vision. With the release Monday of the administration's former top terrorism official's scathing book on how President Bush ignored terrorism warnings, and the ensuing attack on Richard A. Clarke by the administration, a war of words may end up clouding the commission's view.
<snip>
Clarke, the CIA and FBI submitted a joint report to the president that showed there was no connection between al-Qaida and Iraq.
"Wrong answer. ... Do it again," Clarke said the president replied.
<snip>
Clarke said he had a series of meetings in April 2001 about his al-Qaida concerns with the second-in-command of each security-related department. During a meeting with Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Clarke told him the country must focus on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida. He says Wolfowitz replied: "No, no, no. We don't have to deal with al-Qaida. Why are we talking about that little guy? We have to talk about Iraqi terrorism against the United States."
Wolfowitz, Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld were all members of
The Project for the New American Century, a group founded in 1997 that promoted a return to "Reaganite" military strength and a preemptive defense plan. PNAC's September 2000 report, "Rebuilding America's Defenses" -- to which Wolfowitz contributed -- clearly defined Iraq, Iran and North Korea as the greatest threats to the United States.
<snip>
Binghamton, NY is not what one would call a "liberal hotbed."