I found this thanks to the thread to DU a poll on Faux Nooze by Cannakin:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1278731WTF is this? Clarke says in this interview with Jim Angle (of Faux Nooze) and "Andrea" (Mitchell?) that Clinton gave no plan to Bush? Why is this coming out within an hour of Clarke testifying? Is this true?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,115085,00.htmlsnip>>>
RICHARD CLARKE: Actually, I've got about seven points, let me just go through them quickly. Um, the first point, I think the overall point is, there was no plan on Al Qaeda that was passed from the Clinton administration to the Bush administration.
snip>>>>
QUESTION: Were all of those issues part of alleged plan that was late December and the Clinton team decided not to pursue because it was too close to ...
CLARKE: There was never a plan, Andrea. What there was was these two things: One, a description of the existing strategy, which included a description of the threat. And two, those things which had been looked at over the course of two years, and which were still on the table.
QUESTION: So there was nothing that developed, no documents or no new plan of any sort?
CLARKE: There was no new plan.
END SNIPS>>>>
WTF! Was Faux holding this until Clarke was going to testify? WTF??? Cleared by the White House on Wednesday? Faux and Bush, sittin' in a tree...