Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The age of brilliance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:41 PM
Original message
The age of brilliance

Popular accounts of the history of science typically show a chronology in which no major scientific advances take place between the ancient Greeks and the European Renaissance. In between, so we are told, western Europe and, by extrapolation, the rest of the world, languished in the Dark Ages for 1,000 years.

In fact, for a period stretching over 700 years, the international language of science was Arabic. For this was the language of the Quran, the holy book of Islam, and the official language of the vast Islamic empire that, by the early eighth century, stretched from India to Spain.

I have long been possessed with the strong desire to bring this story to a wider audience. That I do so now lies with my belief that it has never been more timely, nor more resonant, to explore the extent to which western cultural and scientific thought is indebted to the work, 1,000 years ago, of Arabic and Muslim thinkers and scientists.

When I first decided to tell of the scientific achievements in the Golden Age of Islam I had no idea how much interest it would generate. After all, as a British professor of theoretical physics, what did I know about the history of medieval Arabic science?

Perhaps I am being a little disingenuous here. Although an academic, I do devote half my time to broadcasting and popular science writing. In addition, as my surname may betray, I have Arab roots. I was born in Baghdad to an English mother and Iraqi father. I grew up there but left as a teenager when Saddam came to power. We were lucky. We quickly settled in Britain and I haven’t looked back – until recently, when the cultural urge to revisit my heritage beckoned.

Two years down the line, I find myself fronting a major BBC television series, half the way through a book on the subject and invited to give talks around the world.

But before I lay out my stall, allow me a few words to counter the inevitable accusations from some quarters that my account will be in some sense “pro-Islamic”; that having grown up in Iraq I see the Muslim world through the rose-tinted glasses of the biased partisan on a mission to show what a wonderful and enlightened religion Islam is. The truth is that I am not religious, yet if Islam emerges from my account in a positive light, as a belief system unencumbered by many of the misconceptions and misinterpretations of today, then so be it.

Sadly, there is no doubt that the term “Islam”, to the ear of many non-Muslims around the world today, too comfortably equates with the modern negative image it has. The implied contrast is of the West as a rational, tolerant and enlightened secular society. This is, of course, not only a lazy view, but also one that makes it difficult to acknowledge that 1,000 years ago the situation was reversed. Think of the Crusades. Who were the “good guys” then? The Golden Age of the vast Islamic empire took place during the rule of the Abbasids from their capital, Baghdad, which I take to be between the mid-eighth and mid-11th centuries. For most people, this period is known only through the romanticised, exotic tales that run through the Arabian Nights, many of which are based on the time of Harun al Rashid (763–809), the larger-than-life caliph who ruled over this vast empire at the end of the eighth and beginning of the ninth centuries.

http://www.thenational.ae/article/20090110/WEEKENDER/98751999/1041
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope his series Science and Islam..
.. comes out on dvd soon.

I really want to see it.

What a fine thing this man has done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okiru109 Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. here is a link to the video...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00gksx4/Science_and_Islam_The_Language_of_Science/

unfortunately it appears to be only for UK viewers =(

anyone know an internet workaround?

thanks in advance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. We are in a state of confusion
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18825293.200

We are in "a period of utter confusion", said Nobel laureate David Gross, summing up last week's prestigious Solvay conference on the quantum structure of space and time (see "Baffled in Brussels"). That is worrying because the topic is central to finding a "theory of everything" that will describe every force and particle in nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It is not at all clear that there is a "theory of everything"
Or that one can have a unitary description of "every force and particle" in nature. That that would be so is an unproven assumption. All we are really pretty sure about is that things have to be "locally" consistent. However these periods when everyone is baffled have historically been very productive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Just for a joke, scroll down through this page and look at the
toing and froing, the hedging and betting, the wondering and the doubting over and over and over again.


http://www.thefinaltheory.com/sciencearticles.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. LOL. That's very funny.
Borders on medieval theological arguments. I studied math, and I have no problem with this sort of "pure physics" as an exploration of possibilities, as we do in "pure math", but one ought not confuse it with what we know about things. I have in the past found the "dark energy" and "dark matter" discussions particularly amusing. Reminds one of "the ether". Speculations about "black holes" are amusing too. And "string theory". Astrophysics seems particularly prone to building mountains of supposition on molehills of fact. I don't blame them in a way, molehills of facts is the best they can hope for, and one suspects that they are sometimes right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC