Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Passion That Offends - Al Hunt's WSJ oped

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 11:51 PM
Original message
A Passion That Offends - Al Hunt's WSJ oped
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. -- Five deeply spiritual, religiously knowledgeable men and women bring different perspectives but all agree that the most popular religious movie in years, Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ," is too violent, unfaithful to history and incendiary. "The repeated violence and the sameness of the violence is numbing," says Diane Wudel, a New Testament scholar at the Wake Forest University Divinity School. Elements of this movie are "quite disturbing," worries Charles Kimball, chairman of Wake Forest's Religion Department.

(snip)

Substantively, however, they were troubled by the film. The violence -- the pain inflicted upon Christ starts early on and is punishing and cruel throughout -- bothered them. This pervasive brutality, like the relentless scourging of Christ, doesn't reflect the gospels, despite Mel Gibson's insistence he followed scripture. Notes Prof. Wudel: "If you add everything up in the gospels, there'd be three minutes of scourging."

On the historical inaccuracy, the scholars note that the four gospels were written decades after Christ died and "we're only getting highlights," observes Professor Kimball. Then the movie picks and chooses from them, with John the dominant one. "Gibson plays fast and loose with the gospels," says Prof. Foskett. One example: the scene when Jesus is in front of the high priest and his answer is taken from Mark, but the question isn't. Thus, says Diane Wudel, the viewer is presented with "an altered question, an answer from Mark, a trial from Luke and a dialogue from John."

(snip)

Curiously, it's noted that for all of the support from Fundamentalists very few mainstream Catholic leaders and almost no liberal Catholics have had anything good to say about "The Passion of the Christ." These Protestant academics suggest that's probably because Catholic leaders understand some of Mr. Gibson's propaganda better than the Fundamentalists do.

Bill Leonard says the most overarching critique is that the story shortchanges God. "When you limit the gospel story only to the crucifixion -- when you don't have the story of the prodigal son, the words of the Sermon on the Mount," he says, "It doesn't tell the story that Jesus shows us what God is like. The love of God is not simply revealed in the brutality of the cross."

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB108017501579864944,00.html

mailto:al.hunt@wsj.com


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC