Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Americans Should Not Stand for Lock-down on Single-Payer Discussion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:34 PM
Original message
Americans Should Not Stand for Lock-down on Single-Payer Discussion
Americans Should Not Stand for Lock-down on Single-Payer Discussion

by Laura Bonham

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/02/06-13


As an ardent advocate of single-payer healthcare for many years, I am more than a little frustrated by Washington insiders—beholden to healthcare corporations—telling the American people that passing single-payer healthcare reform, specifically HR. 676, the United States National Health Care Act, can't happen. The fact is they are standing in the way of it happening.

They cite specious reasons like we're an entrepreneurial nation and need a uniquely American solution, or we can't afford it, or single-payer won't work in the U.S. Well it works quite well in the form of Medicare, an incredibly popular and uniquely American program. In a nutshell, HR 676 basically improves and expands Medicare to cover everybody.

The say it can't happen because Americans don't want it. Polling indicates otherwise; a January 30, CBS poll shows significant support:

Americans are more likely today to embrace the idea of the government providing health insurance than they were 30 years ago. 59% say the government should provide national health insurance, including 49% who say such insurance should cover all medical problems.

- clip -

Besides being the moral and compassionate thing to do (two values which Americans used to embrace), single-payer healthcare makes good business sense. In this study (PDF), research shows single-payer healthcare/Medicare for all would:


Create 2,613,495 million new permanent good-paying jobs (slightly exceeding the number of jobs lost in 2008)--jobs that are not easily shipped overseas
Boost the economy with $317 billion in increased business and public revenues
Add $100 billion in employee compensation
Infuse public budgets with $44 billion in new tax revenues

The U.S. already spends far more on healthcare than any other nation; yet with all our power and treasure, we are the lone wealthy industrialized nation that does not ensure healthcare for all of our citizens. Fifty million Americans are currently uninsured, and twenty two thousand of those Americans die every year because they do not have access to healthcare.

Meanwhile, CEOs of healthcare corporations earn $3.3 million to $22.2 million in salary per year, paltry amounts compared to their stock options. When a CEO earns $1.6 billion in stock options ("Business 2006: Who Won, Who Lost," Associated Press, December 2006), who loses? The average American, that's who—the people who are dying, getting sick from lack of preventative care, facing bankruptcy from medical bills, losing their jobs and their homes. They are Americans who can't afford "health insurance" and certainly can't afford large contributions to senatorial, congressional, and presidential campaigns.

- clip -

If there ever was an opportune moment for guaranteed healthcare for all, now is that moment. Too bad our elected officials refuse to do what they were elected to do—represent us, instead of the interests of the very powerful and wealthy healthcare corporate lobby. Let your member of Congress know that single-payer healthcare/Medicare for all should, at the very least, be an option that should be discussed. While you're at it, give Max Baucus a call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hear, hear!
From the article: "The time to take this option off the table is after an honest debate of the pros and cons of HR 676, not before."

Now why aren't we seeing pieces like this appear in the mainstream press -- NYT, Time, WaPo, etc...

Oh. Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Since I do not think they are going to listen to us wasn't there some
talk about President Obama's plan giving a choice between public and private insurance in such a way that you would have to be crazy to pick private?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can we please dispense with this "what is politically possible" horseshit?
What is possible to do is to a great extent determined by what you actually try to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Very true. I think a big part of the problem is people don't realize they are free anymore.
So ready to accept whatever they are told by "authority figures" whether it's government, corporate, some jackass on the teevee, or even some anonymous poster on an internet forum, without evaluating input themselves. Obedience is everywhere.

Fortunately we don't need a majority to create the change we need. Also unfortunately, since the other side doesn't need a majority to create their change either, and apparently is well ahead of us in realizing that simple truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. thank you
We have to force them to move toward us instead of allowing the minority party to pull the country to the right over and over again.

If the republicans block health care reform in the senate, serious healthcare reform that people can understand and that will meet our needs, they will pay at the polls in 2010 and be faced with the prospect of a filibuster proof senate in 2011. They know this. Do our leaders understand that they are holding the strong hand here?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. It depends on what is actually communicated. If we shut off certain topics, they're not considered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anything less than Single Payer would be a step BACKWARDS... & UNDERMINE eventual Single Payer......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. We need to expose that money is not the same as democracy. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC