Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Times: Obama Expected to Appoint Chamber of Commerce Lobbyist As Gatekeeper to the Judiciary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:32 PM
Original message
LA Times: Obama Expected to Appoint Chamber of Commerce Lobbyist As Gatekeeper to the Judiciary

by: David Sirota

Mon Feb 09, 2009 at 19:02

As the New York Times recently noted, an increasing number of cases that the judicial system deals with are focused on business. That's why the Chamber of Commerce spends ungodly sums of corporate cash trying to make sure that the judicial system is owned and operated by Big Business - and that's why this piece of news is incredibly troubling:

The likely nominee to head Justice's Office of Legal Policy, Mark Gitenstein, worked as a lobbyist for the between 2000 and 2008, helping his firm earn more than $6 million in fees, according to federal lobbying records. The business alliance has pushed the White House and Congress to appoint judges and enact legislation that would make it harder for plaintiffs to sue large corporations and collect large damage awards, raising concerns from some activists.

In recent years, he also has served as counsel to the chamber's Institute for Legal Reform, which pushed for changes in federal litigation rules and adding business-friendly judges to state courts.

Continued>>>
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=73608E704C2FC89AB1D6DF634E96B05D?diaryId=11488
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. i don't like the sound of this at all.
i feel so helpless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. CofC = mouthpiece of wingnuts of the hate working people class nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a lobbyist. I remember a campaign promise, promising none of these. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sadly, he's already broken that promise ...
and now looks to be doing it again. NOT GOOD.

And at the same time the Labor Secretary's nomination
is being held up ... DISAPPOINTED ... DISAPPOINTED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. where are the DLC spinners to explain to us why this is in our best interest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit
This appointment, if it happens, would in no way violate the WH ethics policy nor would it require an exemption (like the deputy DOD appointment did)... this individual's past lobbying has no relation to the job or department he would be going into.

Obviously, Sirota hates Barack Obama as he has done nothing but slam him in every way since he was elected. And in this case he pulls the old political tactic of trying to make something meaningless sound sinister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. This individual's past lobbying for the Chamber of Commerce has a HUGE impact on this position. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Please explain. I don't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Are you dense or faking it?
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 11:29 PM by w4rma
"The business alliance has pushed the White House and Congress to appoint judges and enact legislation that would make it harder for plaintiffs to sue large corporations and collect large damage awards, raising concerns from some activists."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. No, I get that certainly
but how freaking far do you take this. Anybody that ever says any good word one about business is somehow ineligible? He's taking a job at Justice. His boss at justice will direct the focus of the job he does. This justice department will be vetting and promoting judicial appointments that will not be of the kind we've suffered through for the better part of three decades.

Can I see why activists have concern, absolutely. And they should hold Holder's feet to the fire to make sure those fears aren't realized.

As to the concerns you specifically note in your reply, do you have evidence that this nominee pursued those things you mention or other reprehensible pursuits, or is it just that since he comes from a Chamber of Commerce position he must be evil? If there are in fact specific actions in this person's history that would disqualify him, so be it. But I refuse to condemn the guy just because he has represented business interests.

The justice department deals with cases involving people from EVERY walk of life. It wouldn't matter to me if this nominee had been a union attorney, or a doctor, or a peace activist, or a plumber.

Now if he was getting appointed to be the deputy attorney general in charge of SEC cases? Yeah, then I'd say disqualify him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. How does the Chamber of Commerce impact the Judiciary?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Are you kidding me? What kind of judges does the CoC lobby for?
C'mon. Think really hard. What kind of rulings are CoC-leaning judges going to make?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. Did Obama switch parties between the election and the inauguration?
He is beginning to look more like a Republican than a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC