Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama's Reply to Leahy's Announcement of a Truth and Reconciliation Committee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
BlueJessamine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:49 AM
Original message
President Obama's Reply to Leahy's Announcement of a Truth and Reconciliation Committee
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 11:50 AM by BlueJessamine
President Obama's first White House press conference.

Excerpt from the Transcript:




THE PRESIDENT: Sam Stein, Huffington Post -- where's Sam? Here.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. Today Senator Patrick Leahy announced that he wants to set up a truth and reconciliation committee to investigate the misdeeds of the Bush administration. He said that before you turn the page, you have to read the page first. Do you agree with such a proposal, and are you willing to rule out right here and now any prosecution of Bush administration officials?

THE PRESIDENT: I haven't seen the proposal, so I don't want to express an opinion on something that I haven't seen.

What I have said is that my administration is going to operate in a way that leaves no doubt that we do not torture, and that we abide by the Geneva Conventions, and that we observe our traditions of rule of law and due process, as we are vigorously going after terrorists that can do us harm. And I don't think those are contradictory; I think they are potentially complementary.

My view is also that nobody is above the law, and if there are clear instances of wrongdoing, that people should be prosecuted just like any ordinary citizen; but that generally speaking, I'm more interested in looking forward than I am in looking backwards. I want to pull everybody together, including, by the way, the -- all the members of the intelligence community who have done things the right way and have been working hard to protect America, and I think sometimes are painted with a broad brush without adequate information.

So I will take a look at Senator Leahy's proposal, but my general orientation is to say, let's get it right moving forward.


The full transcript is here:

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/02/obamas_first_white_house_press.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. "no one is above the law"...
but "generally" he's not interested in actually holding those thugs and war criminals accountable to that law.

Great. Some change. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh I think President Obama is just not going to be the face of making
the war criminals accountable and that he'll quietly support his DOJ and Congressional efforts. Of course he's interested in moving forward but also expressed that no one is above the law.....he won't ignore findings or stand in the way of Leahy. Keep the faith!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. i really hope you're right
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Actually, his administration is doing the exact opposite
of quietly supporting Congressional efforts by invoking the Bush era's defense of "state secrets" to cover up U.S. torture...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5022013

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I know ...I'm not happy about this but there's more to go after. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Perhaps not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I am not sure what your point is but
as I have pointed out elsewhere and Garbo did in that thread, Letter is a DOJ careerist appointed by Carter and served in the Clinton WH.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope Leahy and possibly Senator Whitehouse look into this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
7.  Take away
Nancy's table,let the AG investage chaney and jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC