If you truly believe in a principle, you stick with it even when you don’t like where it leads you. Hence the famous phrase attributed to Voltaire: “I do not agree with a word you say, but I will fight to the death for your right to say it.” Especially when it comes to the First Amendment and every American’s right to free speech, it ought to be axiomatic in American discourse that every side is entitled to its part in the debate.
More often than not, though, Republicans on the far right don’t seem to get this type of principled rationalism. Rather, the GOP, at least at the fringes, seems to appropriate tropes or principles only when they compel their political goals, and toss them when they’re inconvenient.1 Case in point, Michael Savage, who (suddenly) decided to wax poetic on an American’s right to disagree with the President:
We live in America, and we’re supposed to… ask questions, challenge the government, the government’s supposed to be responsible to the people. Many of you are so ignorant, you don’t even understand that we have this right in America.
It’s truly a remarkable coincidence, isn’t it, that Michael Savage realized the value of dissent in a democracy just as Barack Obama took office, and not a moment earlier? Let’s not forget that for the past eight years, he’s been calling anyone he disagrees with a traitor, from politicians to peace activists. Although “Dr.” Savage finally found the courage to disagree with President Bush, it’s not too long since he railed against President Bush’s doubters as “traitors” - the “Enemy Within,” if you will. Apparently, that same valued right to dissent is heresy when applied to a Republican:
http://www.acandidworld.net/2009/02/23/republicans-really-dont-get-reciprocal-reasoning-do-they/