Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Banksters Win One, Lose One in Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:35 AM
Original message
Banksters Win One, Lose One in Congress

Yesterday, the U.S. House of Representatives handed bankers in the credit card industry a defeat. But almost simultaneously, mortgage bankers won big in the Senate. Senator Richard Durbin lamented <1> that the banks "are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place."

This is a tale of two tallies.

In the U.S. House, H.R.627 <2>, the Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights Act passed by the overwhelming margin of 357 to 70. This measure, sponsored by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), would prevent credit card companies from:

Hiking interest rates any time and for no reason.


Applying newly-increased interest rates to prior existing balances.


Imposing major penalties for minor transgressions.


Imposing late fees even when it is proven that payment was mailed on time.


Imposing finance charges on balances repaid on time.


Marketing and issuing cards to young people who are clearly unable to repay debt.
It should surprise no one that polls show Americans overwhelmingly support this bill. Because they were afraid of a voter backlash, most Republicans supported H.R. 627 on the final vote. But first, almost all of the Republicans voted to kill the bill in a parliamentary maneuver - a motion to recommit that failed 164 to 263.

The bill now moves to the Senate where a similar measure, S. 414 <3> - the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Reform Act (Credit CARD Act) sponsored by Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) - was approved by the Banking Committee on a straight party-line vote of 12 to 11. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid indicated that he will try to bring the bill to the floor sometime next week.

That will be a much tougher fight. The Dodd bill has no Republican support, it will need 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, and the progressives couldn't even get 50 votes for a different, but equally important, banking bill...

Yesterday in the U.S. Senate, the banks won the key vote <4> on S. 896, the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act, which has already passed the House as H.R. 1106. The vote was on Senator Durbin's amendment that would allow judges to modify residential mortgages in bankruptcy. (This provision is saddled with extremely bad message framing - they call it "cramdown.")

Even though the Durbin amendment was supported by President Obama, it failed 45 to 51 with 11 "centrist" Democrats voting against.

The argument for the Durbin amendment is that we should treat residential mortgages the same way we currently treat business mortgages, vacation home mortgages, and secured loans on boats and cars. The court tries to work out a payment plan designed to prevent the loss of the secured asset. In fact, residential mortgages were treated this way in bankruptcy court until 1978.

Without this bankruptcy provision, President Obama's plan to address the housing foreclosure crisis will essentially be limited to federal subsidies - which can't do a lot of good. There's a reasonable argument that everyone, banks included, would benefit from the bankruptcy provision and Citibank has endorsed it. But all the other banks ganged up to defeat it.

There is a moral to this story. No matter what progressive measure President Obama proposes, and no matter what slightly-compromised but still strong legislation is passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, it won't become law without the support of the so-called "moderate" Democrats in the Senate.

Here are the Democrats who voted against the Durbin amendment: Max Baucus (MT), Michael Bennet (CO), Robert Byrd (WV), Tom Carper (DE), Byron Dorgan (ND), Tim Johnson (SD), Mary Landrieu (LA), Blanche Lincoln (AR), Ben Nelson (NE), Mark Pryor (AR), Arlen Specter (PA), and Jon Tester (MT). The credit card legislation - and all other progressive priorities-are in their hands. We'd better figure out a way to swing them to our side.

--------

http://www.truthout.org/050209Y
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, they haven't lost the one they "lost" until it goes to the Senate
I bet it goes by the boards there too. Don't forget that "cramdown" passed the House too.

Yet, as these measures go down in flames, people will continue to talk about the "filibuster-proof" Senate so they can set us up for their troubling questions about why Obama can't get anything done :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. The best government money can buy.
And this is a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Most of the credit card bill was included in 12/08 regulations
I'm not sure that the consumer got anything from this.
But boy did the House get good press for doing nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC