Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Legal savvy, empathy keep Granholm on Supreme Court short list, experts say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 08:47 AM
Original message
Legal savvy, empathy keep Granholm on Supreme Court short list, experts say
Washington -- President Barack Obama could reveal his Supreme Court pick as early as this week, and experts say Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm's best shot is if he's looking to add the fresh perspective of a politician who's dealt up-close with the daily struggles of ordinary Americans.

With Michigan struggling, Granholm certainly would fill that criteria. Other pluses would be her gender, age (50) and her unusual mix of legal and political experience. But, if Obama wants to make a splash with the first Hispanic justice, Granholm's out. Ditto if he's looking for someone who's been a judge -- she hasn't been one.

But one expert says that might not be a deciding factor against Granholm, who is on Obama's short list, according to the Associated Press.

"We've gotten in to our head that you have to be a judge -- that just isn't true," said Russell Wheeler, a leading court watcher at the Brookings Institution, who likes Granholm's chances.

"Here is someone who would bring to the court legal skills -- she's litigated, she was the manager of a large law firm called the Attorney General of Michigan -- and she knows how people are really hurting because of the auto industry and a bad economy. I see her not having been a judge a plus, not a minus." . . .

http://www.detnews.com/article/20090517/POLITICS02/905170316/Legal-savvy--empathy-keep-Granholm-on-Supreme-Court-short-list--experts-say

She is the Choice. It would be a brilliant move; no judicial record to pick apart, thoroughly vetted, and in the tradition of Earl Warren, who Obama so deeply admires. I think - and hope - this will happen. She would hold her own and then some with Roberts, Alito, Scalia and Thomas.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. And as an added bonus it would be a slap in Michigans nit wit republicon enablers
who blame everything on Granholm. I have heard some of these nit wits say crap like "it was Granholm" that caused the big 3 to fail by taxing them to high and supporting the UAW over hard working big 3 auto CEO's, after all making deals at cock tail parties and out on the golf course is hard work. Never mind the nit wits elected a majority of cons to Michigans house and senate who block every move Granholm makes to help the Michigan citizen out. The stupidity of red area's of Michigan are un real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I grew up in one of those areas and you couldn't be more right.
Scary hypocritical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Whats even funnier is hearing these nit wits about their tax dollars being spent on social issues
then they brag about how off shoring their profits and other loop holes they find means they don't pay any taxes, WTF? If you don't pay into the system 1) they are not your tax dollars, 2) why does it bother them how the tax dollar is spent when they pay nothing into it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. So much hypocrisy - so little time. That's just scatching the surface.
I do my best to steer clear of them and the "if you aint Dutch you aint much" mentality. They're offensive and they don't have the slightest clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. She needs to make a public statement on Chrysler and GM bondholders
Edited on Sun May-17-09 09:18 AM by Joanne98
They forced the companies into bankruptcy because they bought credit default swaps that only paid if the companies defaulted. She has been SILENT on this outrageous SCAM!!! She needs to clear that up. BEFORE June 1st!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's a Nice Dream, But
Edited on Sun May-17-09 10:29 AM by Demeter
I cannot see the Senate confirming a Canadian-born woman, regardless of how young she was when she became a US resident and citizen. They haven't been able to do much simpler, more standard things for a decade or more, why expect them to have the vision for this?

And Obama is burning through his political capital so fast, pandering to the banksters, that I doubt he will have much pull in this nomination process to get a non-lawyer, non-judge female on the Court.

I will hope for the best, and plan for the worst.

Odds are, he picks a male Hispanic.


And Michigan gets even less respect than France in DC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. The worst regret is that Obama may get to replace more than one
Supreme Court justice but they will all be liberal. No telling when Americans can get a court which is not right-leaning again, probably not in my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC