Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beat it, Buddy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 10:16 AM
Original message
Beat it, Buddy
Beat it, Buddy
By David Glenn Cox


These are the short days of long shadows, long cold nights of frozen dreams and frozen time. Underneath the heaps of blankets our children lie prostrate, shivering and naked facing the prospect of a dawn as dark as dusk in a land as cold as stone.

The governor of this country's most populous, and formally most prosperous, state recently asked the federal government for $6.9 billion to help close the state's $20 billion budget deficit. The federal government is on the horns of a dilemma; Big Daddy has fifty children and if he helps one then he must then help them all. So the White House vacillates between building redoubts and palisades and “Let them eat cake.”

The White House responds, "We gave you eight billion in stimulus funds last year. What did you do with it?”

“Are there no prisons... and the Union workhouses, are they still in operation?"

California represents 13% of the gross domestic product of the United States; it is far from wise to just say, “Beat it, Buddy.” The appropriation sponsored by Senator John Kerry for $6 billion in the form of aid to Pakistan to rebuild schools and homes moves through the Senate. The State Department recently doubled humanitarian aid to Yemen. Yemen is a country that shares a common border with Saudi Arabia, the wealthiest oil state on planet Earth, but somehow the Yemenis are our problem.

California is suffering through government-admitted unemployment levels of 12.3%, while the actual number might reach 20%, approaching depression era levels, and the Obama administration says, “Beat it, Buddy.” California is third in the nation for home foreclosures, behind Nevada and Florida, and threatens to lead the nation in commercial property foreclosures.

California is rapidly approaching the intersection of hard times and hard realities and the crash will affect us all. So it borders on the height of arrogance or the summit of incompetence for White House advisor David Axelrod to say, “We recognize they have enormous problems, but we can’t solve all of those problems from Washington.”

Harry Truman once said, “The White House was the finest prison in the world.” The current administration had better send out scouts from behind its walls and gates or it will find that its sentence has been significantly shortened. The President has a wonderful job. He can go on TV and propose lofty goals while he has the ability to send servants to the door to tell the beggars to “Beat it, Buddy!”

Meanwhile, back at the skull ranch, Congress continues hearings on the AIG bailout, which has reached $182 billion. They are questioning whether the Federal Reserve Bank of New York paid 100 cents on the dollar for securities that were trading for significantly less on the street.

“The New York Fed said it had to make the payments after banks refused to accept so-called haircuts, according to a November audit from Neil Barofsky, the special inspector of the U.S. Troubled Asset Relief Program.”

Strange days, indeed, when the slide looks up through the microscope and into the eyeball of the scientist. Oh, no! We won’t accept that, you must rescue us on our own terms! The banks seeking rescue tell the Federal Reserve on what terms they will accept a bailout, but a sovereign state of the union is told to hit the bricks.

“The bank is something more than men, I tell you. It's the monster. Men made it, but they can't control it.” (John Steinbeck)

Thirty seven million citizens of California don’t hold the sway with Washington of a half a dozen banks in New York. This is the crux of the matter and defines our times. We cannot save ourselves by rescuing investment banks. We must save our people and thereby save the banks, or in the long run the banks will all go to hell anyway.

It's a grand Katrinaesque scenario where an entire state is told to bugger off by the federal government. California has already made cuts in education and social programs; there is no fat left to trim. State workers have already been asked to work fewer hours for less pay with a heavier workload. Without federal assistance the next round of cuts will mean more people will become homeless and others will die. It is an economic hurricane and a national disgrace.

Imagine yourself the Governor of California, having to make such terrible decisions on what necessary programs for the weakest, the sickest and the elderly will need to be cut. Then look over the horizon at Senator Ben Nelson’s sweetheart Medicaid deal with the federal government picking up the tab for 100% of Nebraska’s Medicaid bill. Of the deal Schwarzenegger said, "Nebraska got the corn and we got the husk.”

California’s bond rating has been cut and now cut again until the credit rating for the state of California is now two steps lower than Greece, the poorest member of the European Union. It means the state must pay a higher interest rates to the banks that were bailed out by the federal government, which told California to take a hike when it asked for federal assistance. If that’s not privatization I don’t know what is.

Does the White House suppose that this can go on and continue to be ignored? Can they spin the financial collapse of the most populous state in the union with an economy larger than Russia’s? It boggles the mind because California is but the tip of the iceberg. Right behind it lies New York and New Jersey, Florida, Pennsylvania and Illinois. Can they continue to close their eyes and wish them all away?

We are a union, or we are not.

“It ain't that big. The whole United States ain't that big. It ain't that big. It ain't big enough. There ain't room enough for you an' me, for your kind an' my kind, for rich and poor together all in one country, for thieves and honest men. For hunger and fat.” (John Steinbeck)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Love Steinbeck Quote
One of the greatest authors and certainly appropriate for the times.

Doesn't CA give the federal government much more than it receives, money that goes to other states that are not so prosperous? A bailout for CA should not just be seen as helping this state if that is the case.

Of course there are those that cheer the idea of CA suffering and are eager to see CA forced to lay off most government workers, nullify all pension and union contracts and privatize prison systems and law enforcement. I'm talking of course of libertarians, those that follow Ron Paul and read Mish's site. How anyone can promote the idea that less government less regulation lower corporate taxes and lower wages is the answer to the states economic woes is beyond me.

I'm not sure what the answer is but inflicted more pain on the working class while benefiting business doesn't wash. I hope the white house figures out a way to support CA and all the states.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. As predicted.. now the States line up for a bailout...
Sadly, the strings that come attached to these Federal bailout... Ay...yi..yi... Lucy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Living in Michigan, My Native Land
I find it very hard to shed a tear for California, land of Nixon, Reagan, Prop 13 and a century of Disneyland fantasy.

California was the Golden Child for decades; when it didn't even need the help, the handout from Uncle Sugar, it still got it.

Come to Detroit, if you want to see Depression not as a theme park, but as a reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Michigan is on the short list
It is not about shedding tears for California it is about understanding that we are one nation with one big problem.

The same people who point fingers at California will say the same things about Michigan and then New York and then Illinois and on and on. We rise or fall as one nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. We rise or fall as one nation

Our country has a big financial problem, soon to collapse. I think we will come together as a nation to survive the future. Otherwise, we won't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1gobluedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. I'm sorry people are suffering in California
But I have to agree with Demeter. California is a big player in the demise of the US auto industry by allowing Asian imports to be dumped in the US in the 1980s so they could gain a foothold in the US market, even though US autos didn't get the same privilege in Asia. As a Michigander, I have a hard time working up a lot of sympathy now.

I don't like to see US citizens suffer ever. But California turned its back on Michigan a long time ago and still doesn't give a damn about what's happened here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. I say help Haiti...but cut or stop all other payments to other countries..
and end the wars.
Those last two things alone could pay for healthcare and help to balance the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MdFriendofHillary Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is it all together inappropriate to remember the joy of Obama 2008?
Ok, it's off message.
Sort of.
In response to the negativity -- whether or not appropriate -- of "let them eat cake" as a response to helping California, I would offer the following.

A few months ago, I was the "star" (subject?) of the video "Teabaggers can't handle a little dissent" which somebody shot the day I took my "Public Option, NOW!" sign to one of Glenn Beck's Tea Parties. A lot of people said a lot of very nice things about me and I got the idea that I could add to the dialogue by making a video from the still shots I made from thousands of supports who waved my Obama signs of similar construction.

So I made it; it's out there. But I haven't figured out how to tell anyone. I just joined here, so I can't add my own post, yet, and it would probably reach a larger audience if one of the superstars here posted it.

So, there it is. The video is on YouTube. I called it "Yes! We Did. Obama 2008 Through the Eyes of a Thousand Supporters." It has a fully licensed soundtrack that includes Matt Cameron of Pearl Jam. If some of you could look at it and let me know if I need to keep my day job and go wave a few more signs, maybe that's what I need to hear. But if you like it, please let me know that, too.
It's at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKs4y1YsVoY

Edward Kimmel
Takoma Park
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Ed
I've been married twice so I understand that things don't always work out the way we want. I voted for Obama and was over joyed when he won but I haven't changed.

When Obama told John McCain that he was against taxing health insurance policies, I agreed with him.

When he said that he favored a strong public option, I agreed with him.

When he said that he was going to scale back our military interventionism, I agreed with him.

The public is just so fickle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MdFriendofHillary Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. When do you pull the plug, and toward what end?
The marriage analogy is apt.
If you want a happy marriage, you pretty much have to TRY to stay overjoyed, until finally they've gone too far.
I'm not happy that we still have troops in Afghanistan, and I'm beside myself that we still have troops in Iraq.
I'm a single payer guy, myself; Public Option was merely the best anyone thought we could do and I'm not the least bit happy that it seems to be going away.
I don't know why peace is so hard. I truly haven't heard any explanation that makes a bit of sense to me except being afraid to have the resulting bloodbath appear to be the fault of the last president of the war. This pessimistic view says that we can't kill enough Arabs for the survivors to love us and that, therefore, when we DO finally leave the ones who sided with us will be the targets of an angry Arabia eager to wipe their lands clean of our memory. It finds that chaos after we leave is inevitable, so it might as well come sooner, rather than later, before another dead soldier, before another dead civilian, before another generation of Arabs who learn that our presence in their land is a destructive force.
But what is the choice?
It seems to me that the alternative to rallying around the leader of our side, is to make their side more successful.
If we stay home from the Tea Party, who wins?
There may come a time when I can no longer rally the troops to support Barack Obama. But for now, I truly do believe that if I could build more public support for a public option, we would have one. If the nation were clamoring for peace, the troops would come home. But Barack Obama's failure does not make those things more likely.
So try to remember the joy; remember what his election meant to us. Then logon to Organizing for American and make the calls.
This may help: it's called "Yes! We did. Obama 2008 Through the Eyes of a Thousand Supporters"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKs4y1YsVoY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Yes we did, but

When the president gets in office, he finds he really doesn't have the power he thinks he does. Our government is currently hijacked by the lobbyists and big corporations who 'buy' politicians to enact laws to keep the status quo for the wealthy. It's all about money, lots of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. California is suffering somewhat from its own wacko politics. The constraints on its
budget process are crazy; term limits effectively left the institutional memory of its legislature entirely in the hands of lobbyists; and voters like having actors like Reagan or Schwarzenegger as governor. Wacko politics led to the completely irresponsible default of prosperous Orange County fifteen years ago. Wacko politics also set up Californians to be screwed in an entirely predictable manner in the great utility deregulation scam

"The financial collapse of the most populous state in the union" would of course be a serious matter; but it would not be entirely the fault of the White House, whatever David Glenn Cox thinks

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. California's problems
Edited on Fri Jan-15-10 08:50 AM by Daveparts still
are not the White Houses fault! But neither was Hurricane Katrina. it is how they respond to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Proposition 13 set the stage for permanent budget problems in California. For more than
thirty years, it has been essentially impossible to raise taxes in California. That limits the services the state can provide its citizens, and it is presently being used as an excuse to allow the private sector to strip away state assets at firesale prices

That predates the current Administration. And since Californians hold more sway with their state government than with the Federal government, it is natural to expect California's citizens to assign some responsibility to their own state and its policies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. We could assign
the same argument to the Haitians but when people need help they need help.
You could use the same argument against providing assistance to every state in the union meanwhile the people suffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. California is really not very much like Haiti. In the case of Haiti, the US has sent in
armed thugs to overthrow the elected government twice in the last two decades. After each ouster, thousands of opponents of the coup-gangs were murdered for political reasons. And from the beginning, the Bush II Administration actively worked to discourage banks from lending money to Haiti, which was one of the poorest countries in our hemisphere

That's really not very much like US policy towards California. The Orange County financial meltdown, a few years back, wasn't caused by poverty or outside interference; at the time, Orange County was one of the most prosperous regions in the US; the problem was Proposition 13, a decision California voters had made a decade earlier. California ought to repeal Proposition 13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. The point is
you can always find a reason to say no, but like Louisiana they are hurting and need help. What did the Bush administration do when accused of not doing enough? They blamed the state government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. My point is: help should be appropriate help. Job-creating federal investment in infrastructure
could help ordinary Californians and might also serve national goals; for example, federal investment in mass transit in California could help reduce national dependence on oil. Simply giving California federal money to balance its state budget is an idiotic idea: California's state budget problems result in part from California's idiotic Proposition 13, which reflects a disinterest in paying state taxes; I don't see why that problem should be solved by federal borrowing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC