Real Communities are Self-Organizing

[GliderGuider]

Here are a few excerpts from a great article by Dimitry Orlov on the nature of community, espercially within the context of modern consumerist America:

Real Communities are Self-Organizing

In all of my experience, communities — of people and animals — form instantaneously and rather effortlessly, based on a commonality of interests and needs. What takes a lot of work is not organizing communities, but preventing them from organizing — through the use of truncheons and tear gas, or evictions and mass imprisonment, or, more recently, more subtle and ultimately more successful techniques of the consumerist political economy.

As an aside, I'd like to point out that the US is not much of a representative democracy any more. It's more of a hokey-pokey-ocracy: in one election cycle, you throw your right bums out and vote your left bums in, and in the next election cycle, or the one after, you do the exact opposite. (And you shake it all around in the meantime.) The bums — the Republicans and the Democrats, that is — are perpetually locked in a loving embrace, for they truly complete each other. The Democrats tend to believe that government is there to help people, which is of course impossible for a government that's chock-full of Republicans who believe in limiting the scope of government and sabotage all such efforts. The Republicans believe in limiting the scope of government, which is of course impossible for a government that's chock-full of Democrats who believe that government is there to help people, and sabotage all such efforts. You can vote for either party if you want it to fail while producing an ever larger and more useless government.

Both parties agree that the government should serve corporate interests. They are both skittish when talking about the rights of citizens, and prefer to talk about "consumers" rather than "citizens". As a nation of consumers, people in the US have no choice but to be consumers. The ones that don't have the money still get to consume things like orange jumpsuits and prison food. Foreign non-consumers also get to consume — things like depleted uranium and white phosphorus ordinance. Being a non-consumer is not an option, and the whole world must be made safe for consumerism. Organizing against consumerism amounts to biting the corporate hand that feeds you — an ungrateful and self-defeating thing to do. So you want to organize a third party? Be my guest; see you later.

Hopkins (GG: Rob Hopkins of the Transition Towns movement) raises an interesting issue when he mentions the common criticism of intentional communities and the Transition Towns movement that it is predominantly white, educated, and middle-class. This is hardly surprising, since these are the only people who have the resources and the connections to do pretty much as they please. They can create their alternative arrangements out in the open, as long as they don't actively threaten the status quo. They can build an entire Garden of Eden if they so desire, provided they can line up the financing and pull the construction permits. That is the essence of consumer choice, isn't it? The rich get to play, while other, less privileged parts of the population, such as the immigrants, the squatters and the homeless, the chronically unemployed or underemployed, the bums (the real ones, not the ones in government), simply don't have the same options. At the same time, their need for community is much greater, and so they spontaneously self-organize, network informally, and defend their interests as best they can. They all know that "a nail that sticks up gets hammered down" and so they don't advertise their efforts or make them official or explicit.

[midnight]

1. Interesting.

[Demeter]

2. As One Who Has Been Trying to Organize My Condo Association

Let me tell you, America's rugged individualists don't want to be organized.

They want to defeat their neighbors, not join with them. They want to insure that their little piece of the action is untouched, not that the entire pie grows, and DEFINITELY not that the starving are fed.

In fact, I'm changing my name to Cassandra and moving to Greece. Or maybe Venezuela.

Our immigrant forebears were not so smugly arrogant, believe me. They organized around common principles, created networks that actually worked to provide tangible benefits, and were willing to see that those benefits were equal to all, not just their membership. They were AMERICANS--coming to this land because they believed in AMERICA'S first principles.

Their grandchildren have betrayed the country.

[GliderGuider]

3. The mass re-education program that flowed from the Powell Memo has borne its fruit.

http://www.reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate_accountability/powell_memo_lewis.html

The Powell Memo of 1971 was a significant milestone in corporatizing the mindset of American citizens. Its influence is largely unrecognized, but IMO was fundamental. It was complementary to the bestowing of personhood on corporations though the interpretation of "Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad". The social influences that were fostered by those two events have bulldozed the American psychic landscape.

[Karenina]

4. . .