I saw this on another board, but I think this really says it all about today's unconscionable decision by the USSC:
It is with deep sadness that I note the passing, on the morning of January 21, 2010, of American democracy. It died in Washington, D.C., in the chambers of the United States Supreme Court, after a long and painful illness, as five of the nine justices finally pulled the plug.
...
But, almost unnoticed, a cancer had begun to grow in its late 200s, as we ingested some bad Supreme Court appointees, named not for their wise jurisprudence but because they towed a particular ideological line. This cancer, or "Scalioma," could not have harmed us if, just six months before our 200th birthday, we had not first been weakened by a condition called Buckley v. Valeo-itis, which officially defined corporations, with their immortality and unlimited resources, as individuals who normally don't share those advantages, and miraculously transformed money into speech. Scalioma has taken over now, and one of this disease's agents of metastasis, the Kennedy microbe, today provided the final symptom that has led to the death of the once mighty Democracy six months before what would have been its 234th birthday.
See, the Supreme Court today handed down their decision in the "Citizens United v. FEC" case today, a little noticed event but one that has absolutely enormous consequences for democracy and American liberty, possibly greater than any event throughout our entire history. Today's 5-4 decision, with the usual breakout (Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Roberts and Kennedy on one side, Breyer, Ginzburg, Sotomayor and Stevens, who wrote a 90-page dissent, on the other), holds that corporate expenditures on political campaigns cannot be limited by law because to do so violates corporate "freedom of speech."
So now, the FULL resources of Exxon-Mobil, of Verizon, of Eli Lilly, of The Hartford, etc., etc., etc., can be brought to bear in purchasing media time for political advocacy during the period leading up to our elections. The content of the material they broadcast is unlimited as is the scope of their investment -- they can lie (as they so frequently do) in ways rendered particularly persuasive by the cleverness of the professionals they can hire to do it. Their ability to devote vast sums of cash to the effort will drive prices for media time into the stratosphere, rendering it unaffordable for lesser entities like those that espouse a more egalitarian or societally responsible view. The notion that this can somehow be balanced off by a similar lifting of regulations on union political spending is like equating a child's popgun with a nuclear bomb.
Did you appreciate the work of the Swift Boaters? Now you will see it times a hundred or more. Truth will be lost. Democracy is lost.
...
linkOne of the WORST decisions the high court EVER rendered. We are truly fucked.