Mr. President, you worry me. You said: the same thing that swept you into office last year...

[JohnWxy]

is what won the Massachusetts election for an unknown Republican. You said: "People are angry. They are frustrated."

YOu are right. People are angry and frustrated, but do you know which frustrated people made a difference in this debacle?

Is it possible you still don't get it?

www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=139481&mesg_id=139481

"John McCain received 1,104,284 vote in the presidential and Brown received 1,168,107 votes.

Obama won 1,891,083 votes in the presidential while Coakley got 1,058, 682."

Brown got a 5.7% bump over McCain, but Coakly took a 44% DROP from your numbers in the Presidential election.

Now admittedly, Coakly had the appeal of a dung beetle, but this was not a referendum on Coakly. It was a referendum on you.


When you said a few months ago that the Public Option "would be nice to have but it isn't an absolute necessity" you threw the Public Option over-board. You cut the ground out from under the Democrats in the Senate and House making it very difficult (to impossible) to get the Public Option dealing (this applies more to the Senate) with Republicans dedicated to killing Health Care Reform. You might have been able to save the Public Option if you had shown you were prepared to fight for it, but you didn't do that.

I have said before in this forum and in communications to the WH and with my Senators and Congressman - that if the Democrats didn't fight for the Public Option you would find many Democratic voters would be disaffected and they would be somewhat apathetic about going to the polls to vote for people who didn't at least fight for real Health Care Reform - that is -- with a Public Option.

And THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. THOSE are the frustrated people who made the difference in Massachusetts - by NOT showing up at the polls. Even if you had not gotten the PUblic Option (although I and most Democrats feel if you had fought for it you could have achieved it) at least Democrats would have seen you tried.

For all the sucking up you did to those totally committed to your failure ... at ANYTHING --- YOU GOT NOTHING. NOT ONE FUCKING COPORATE LOBBYIST VOTE. THAT's WHAT POST-PARTISAN POLITICS GOT YOU ....along with a disaffected Democratic electorate.

Mr. President, we are all aware that you greatly admire Abraham Lincoln. You admire the way he brought people together of diverse political persuasions to achieve a common goal. But, Mr. President, please do not forget, Lincoln fought a war for what was right. When you are faced with an implacable foe - an implacable foe which uses 'the Big Lie' to confuse, to foment fear and loathing solely to keep you and Democrats from achieving practical solutions to problems, you have to realize you are not going to gain their cooperation making an appeal based on the "common good". These people don't give a damn about the "common good". You can't join hands in mutual endeavor with someone who's holding a bomb in his.

Fight for what's right Mr. President. Even if you should lose the present battle, you fought the good fight and in the long run you will win.

[closeupready]

1. I also didn't understand why he felt compelled to draw a parallel between him and Brown.

They aren't even in the same party.

I guess to be fair, he comes from Chicago, which is essentially a one party town where there effectively is no opposition. So perhaps he doesn't get that his opposition is real, powerful and they want him to fail.

He needs to stop the bipartisanship crap, because that is just the wrong way to go.

[truedelphi]

4. Does he care about being so "Bi-partisian?"

Or is this "Bi-Partisn" crap merely a cover story to let his Handlers get what he promised to THEM?

He came into office with a 62% mandate to make good on his pledges. He IMMEDIATELY forgot his pledge that under His Administration, Business would not be as usual.

Instead he offered full support to Bernanke, and put in Geithner. This was about giveing away our economy to the Banking/Fraudsters.

Then he made absolutely NO STRONG STATEMENTS about the Health Insurance Bill. Although he had continually stated as cadidate Obama that there would be a strong public option, once in office, he "forgot" about that pledge.


His cover for all this was that he wanted to be "Bi-Partisan." Funny that he never mentioned that word when we were out phone banking, camapigning and giving him our money.

I don't want a quarter back on my team that stops at the five yard mark and gives the ball to the other team. Even if the other team is sreaming that he hand it to them.
Nor do I want this kind of guy running the nation.

I want my nation back, but with the Powers that Be controlling everything, I don't know how that will happen.

[ima_sinnic]

7. +1

[BadgerKid]

2. Hey Dems - action needed, not lip service. n/t

[whattheidonot]

3. be Democrats.

Got to be Democrats and not in betweeners. the balance of power in this nation is out of whack. remember to be a Democrat does not mean no capitalism just a capitalism that is not so top driven to the exclusion of most everybody else. does it really make a lot of sense that a stock is doing great while people have no jobs?

[Myrina]

5. Bingo!

K&R

[Vidar]

6. K&R.

[depakid]

8. Spot on