|
Edited on Fri Feb-26-10 02:48 PM by kenny blankenship
and they are propagandized much more effectively than Soviet citizens were I would say. In the USSR there was one source for news and opinion and everyone knew what it was, and everyone knew that it was lying, and why it was lying.
But in this country news media say the same thing, have the same underlying ideological intent, for which they lie frequently and omit relevant truth constantly. But because the propaganda emanates from what appear to be multiple sources in competition with one another, the people are blinded to the way that it lies to them. "If there was any undiscovered truth out there, one of the networks would surely reveal it to gain an advantage on the others," we're conditioned to believe. But on substantive issues of economics and class power, the ostensibly competing channels share a uniform interest - to keep people powerless and uninformed- and they share a mutual blindspot, enforced by their own separate self interest to 100% effectiveness, all without an industry board of censors, or even the threat of state control.
And so when the people realize that there is a need for a certain policy (like an employment policy, say, because the economy is falling apart from a deflationary spiral of widespread job losses leading to loan defaults, leading to more job loss, and so on), but this policy conflicts with the full spectrum domination of elites, in which elites alone decide in their private wisdom how capital should be allocated, the news media will condition the people to believe that the employment policy can be tolerated only if it does not infringe against an accepted principle which is antithetical to the needed policy. The new policy goes forward because of the urgency of the jobs situation, but then the media start to incubate the seeds of this abstract principle "which everyone knows is of paramount importance!" They jump on the new policy with their abstract principle as if it hadn't already been invalidated by the conditions which provoked the new policy response. Hasn't the new policy been given enough time to work already? they ask the confused public. In reality the new policy has probably been in effect for only a few weeks. Isn't it in danger of contravening our cherished abstract principle which everyone knows is of paramount importance? they begin to ask. Hasn't it all gone too far? They neglect to remind the public that it had in effect abandoned this abstract principle when it embarked on the new policy, and when it elected new leadership, because long term adherence to this principle, and policies derived from it, is what brought on the crisis in which it now fights for its life.
Thus the people, lashed this way and that by an ideologically motivated and lying news media that is always acting in service to its corporate ownership and sponsors, are led to self-contradictions and confusion. Bewilderment is the charm elites exert upon the people to keep them from seizing control of the state and directing it to a common good. That's all they need to rule.
|