|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:02 PM Original message |
Palin Supports Creation Of Third Party: ‘That Can Be Part Of A Healthy Process’ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kutjara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's a brilliant idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLoner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. I agree, a third party (Tea Party) would be awesome, LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. You go, girl! Start that party and pull all the wacko loonies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
4. Sounds like Sarah is positioning herself to run as the tea party candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meeshrox (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. woohoo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
6. She is a broken clock. She got it right this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
7. I like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. There's a name the original tea partiers would have for her ilk - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fatbuckel (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
9. Third Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nealmhughes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
10. I'll edit all the new party's lit for free! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrs_p (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
11. i too support third party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
12. OMG, that would be gold for us, lol. The Republican hopeful, Romney, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
13. More proof the lady just doesn't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andronex (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 12:21 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. I'm afraid you got it backwards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
14. She needs to talk to Ralph Nader for advice in how to run a third party campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
15. yipeee - let's subdivide the Republicans into 2 and split the vote !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
16. They got the tea party. What more do they want? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
18. the gop leaders (use that term loosely), who have not pushed aside the teabaggers, because they know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC