|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
![]() |
Jefferson23
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:11 AM Original message |
Obama Says Liberal Courts May Have Overreached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
2. oh for god's sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
3. talk about spinning a story 180 degrees from the TRUTH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
27. Charlie Savage is neither stupid nor dishonest. The concern is valid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:37 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Bullshit, Savage lied or was totally confused as to what the President said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:43 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. I READ the entire piece, seems you have no concern about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:21 AM Response to Reply #27 |
67. Seems to be a misunderstanding and/or overstatement to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
4. OMG! Did I ever "mis-read" this politician two years ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Develop your critical reading skills |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Stop playing "professor" ... few people are all-knowing. It reflects poorly on us all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:31 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Damn it! the facts matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:54 AM Response to Reply #23 |
38. Your skewed opinion paraded around as "facts?" No, you can't deny what's in quotes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:25 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. Maybe you did - or maybe you believe the mischaracterization of the remarks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Who is a Republican? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:22 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. But I would add: "a moderate one" who democrats can reason with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:23 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Read the remarks, not the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:29 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Sadly many people will believe what they WANT to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:35 AM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Let's just say, your TRUTH and mine diverge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:58 AM Response to Reply #13 |
39. Deleted message |
Jefferson23
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 11:22 AM Response to Reply #5 |
42. Obama is not a Republican, and that is NOT what Savage is suggesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
9. That has got to be one of the most slanted and mis-skewed pieces I've ever read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. care to elaborate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:29 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. First, go read or listen to what the President said. And then read this POS article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 01:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
45. so what exactly was obama trying to imply with this statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyne
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:25 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. No kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:27 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. yes it is, that's why it's popular with the Anti-Obama crowd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
11. He said no such thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:27 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Very true, but why let facts and the truth stand in the way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suzie
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:29 AM Response to Reply #11 |
22. But that would meaning giving up today's reason to dislike Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:34 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. We can't have that could we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:38 AM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Yes, nothing we present has any veracity at all ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 02:53 PM Response to Reply #31 |
52. Deleted message |
Jefferson23
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #11 |
32. Savage quoted Obama, and explain why Obama would not refer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
12. Deleted message |
Richardo
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
24. What he REALLY said: 'Conservatives are hypocrites when they paint only liberal courts as 'activist' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:34 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. EXACTLY!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:36 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:42 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. wow, you really have gone off the deep end |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:46 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. May I also say that you are not a paragon of self-restraint yourself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:45 AM Response to Reply #24 |
35. He added, “The concept of judicial restraint cuts both ways.” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:53 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Why did you post this NYT version of the story when there are dozens out there without the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 10:59 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Why don't you post that article? These quotes are subject to OPINION/COMMENTARY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 11:19 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Because I think for myself. There is nothing in Savages piece |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 01:14 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Perhaps because Obama made absolutely no references to any cases, only the 2 people who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 01:53 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. “The concept of judicial restraint cuts both ways.” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. What can I say? To me, it means the concept of judicial restraint cuts both ways. See nothing wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 02:29 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. but why even bring it up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 02:48 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. "Where did he do this?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 03:07 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. I truly don't see his statement as saying the liberal courts were 'guilty' of anything. He said the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tutankhamun
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:37 PM Response to Reply #44 |
56. Yes, these writers are clearly twisting what Obama said to suit what they want to say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #37 |
49. same quotes.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surrealAmerican
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #24 |
50. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
43. Overreached WHAT??!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
54. So Obama feels that Brown v. Board of Education was wrongly decided? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:04 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. No, Obama confined his remarks to the 60's and 70's, Brown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 08:10 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. The right to privacy and reproductive freedom was likely what he was referring to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. No, and I'll tell you why. Obama has made it very clear he supports |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 08:30 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Comments that he's made make me suspect that as a legal doctrine, his support is limited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scentopine
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
57. Sheesh, what next from our "centrist" purists, opening up off shore oil drilling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
58. This is in accordance with the public's view and may help him appoint a liberal nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
59. The constitutional law lecturer trying to have it both ways again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
63. Dude, there are times to pontificate and there are times to just STFU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
64. Who is this man? I swear I have a love/hate relationship with this President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
65. I don't believe I've ever seen a thread with more "ignored" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoeyT
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
66. What he said is actually open to quite a bit of interpretation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC