Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Full sovereignty in Iraq might not be so

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 01:26 AM
Original message
Full sovereignty in Iraq might not be so
<snip>
Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser to former President Carter, says the term "full sovereignty" - emphasized Tuesday by Bush, Secretary of State Colin Powell and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice - lacks credibility. No government can be fully sovereign while its country is "still being occupied by a foreign army, 140,000 men, subject to our authority," he said.
<snip>

The State Department said Tuesday the interim government - a 33-member cabinet was announced Tuesday in Baghdad - will be free to establish diplomatic relations with Iran or other countries if it wishes.
But Simon Chesterman, of the Institute for International Law and Justice at New York University, likens U.S. relations with the future Iraqi caretaker government to the dominant role the Soviet Union maintained over pliable East Bloc allies during the last century.
<snip>

"The transfer of nominal sovereignty to a few chosen Iraqis in a still-occupied country will brand any so-called sovereign Iraqi authority as treasonous," Brzezinski says.
<snip>

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apmideast_story.asp?category=1107&slug=Iraq%20What%20Is%20Sovereignty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is going to backfire on Bush, bigtime.


There are a lot of morons out there not reading the fine print who are expecting our soldiers out thre to be returning after the handover date.

Once the date comes and goes and the violence continues, the gig will be up.

I dont understand why Bush is doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He's hoping that the violence after 30 June ...

will be directed at the "Iraqi government" and not at the US troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. So Bush can say, "Mission Accomplished"...again.
Except nothing's changed. It is so friggen' obvious that this is a date picked to enhance his election, that only a naive fool would believe otherwise.

I wonder what the role of our Army will be after 6/30? Will they be called out at the behest of the new government? Will the new Iraqi government dare to call on the US troops for security? If Iraq re-nationalizes the oil industry, who'd stop them? Our troops? Under whose authority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC