In the dark
Blockage of Disclose Act boosts secretive special-interest campaign clout
HOUSTON CHRONICLEJuly 31, 2010, 4:37PM
With midterm elections just around the corner, the continuing partisan gridlock in the U.S. Senate has jammed consideration of the Disclose Act, an attempt to mitigate the damage done by the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision.
Earlier this year the high court ruled that corporations, unions and other groups have free speech rights to independently spend unlimited funds to support favored candidates. Not only did the 5-4 vote by the court's conservative majority shred campaign finance laws in 24 states that restrict such activities, it left it to Congress and the states to decide what disclosure requirements should accompany the expected spending frenzy.
President Barack Obama urged Congress to craft rules to provide transparency in campaign spending. The Democratic majority in the House passed legislation with provisions aimed at revealing the identity of the funding sources for campaign ads and large contributions to nonprofit groups that support candidates.
On Tuesday the Senate failed by a largely party-line 57-41 vote to garner the filibuster-proof 60 votes necessary to debate its version of the bill. Not a single Republican supported it. As a result, legislation to let the American people know who is behind an expected blitz of campaign advertising in November will not likely be approved before the elections. Republicans argued that the Disclose Act favored Democrats because it targeted large corporations, which tend to favor the GOP. But the bill also regulated big contributions from Democratic-leaning labor unions.
Once again the Senate has put partisanship over the best interests of the American people. We will soon find out just how damaging a torrent of anonymous special-interest money can be to the electoral process.
more...
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/7133894.html