Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Questions Mount About White House's Overly Rosy Report On Oil Spill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 11:37 AM
Original message
Questions Mount About White House's Overly Rosy Report On Oil Spill
Questions Mount About White House's Overly Rosy Report On Oil Spill

by Dan Froomkin


Two congressmen on Thursday questioned why the Obama administration made a major announcement about what happened to the oil in the Gulf of Mexico earlier this month without the science to back it up .

Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Ed Markey demanded that NOAA surrender the data and algorithms behind its increasingly controversial estimate, so that independent scientists could assess the credibility of its conclusion that the vast majority of the oil BP spilled in the Gulf is gone,

<snip>

Since the oil budget went public, several independent scientists have called for the release of its supporting data. Others have reached their own, conflicting conclusions.

One group organized by the Georgia Sea Grant this week calculated that 70 to 79 percent of the oil remains underwater, and concluded that "the media interpretation of the report's findings has been largely inaccurate and misleading."

Scientists from the University of South Florida have found oil deep on the Gulf seafloor that they say may be more toxic to marine microorganisms than previously believed.

And in a major, peer-reviewed article in Science magazine, scientists at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on Thursday described their discovery in June of a plume of hydrocarbons that is at least 22 miles long and more than 3,000 feet below the surface of the Gulf of Mexico. That's about the size of Manhattan.

Furthermore, the scientists found that contrary to the NOAA report, the oil was not "biodegrading quickly"-- at least not at that depth.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/20/overly-rosy-report-on-oil_n_688142.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. well they HAD to shut down the reporting on it..didn't they? And it worked..
Edited on Sun Aug-22-10 11:43 AM by flyarm
it screwed the people on the Gulf ..but that is just collateral damage right????????:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :grr: :grr: :grr:

Move along now..nothing to see..:sarcasm:

The powers that be know the American people have the attention span of a Gnat..tell them everything is AOK..and they move their 2 minute sound bite minds on to the next Natalie Holloway! And to help it along they hire people to go onto the internet to squash any truth there is !!

Easy to do..Bush did it for 8 years..it is all part and parcel of the tactics ........of our government and the MIC...and corporatism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. sort of like the overly-rosy report(s) on the economy?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. the water is fine and just smell the fish...
another Katrina like disaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why let the facts get in the way of a "good feeling story" ............??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC