Smart Remarks:
After seeing it referenced on some blog somewhere, I recently picked up and am about halfway through
“Voices of Protest: Huey Long, Father Coughlin, & the Great Depression,” and let me tell you, Huey Long is just an amazing character. An insistent proponent of wealth “redistribution,” he could have gone toe-to-toe with Glenn Beck and shouted him down.
Long, of course, is remembered now for his near-dictatorial control over Louisiana in the 1920s and early 1930s, prior to his assassination in 1935. And some of his methods, shall we say, make the machine politics in places like Chicago seem demure by comparison. But he was pure, unapologetic progressivism; he founded the “Share Our Wealth” societies, advocated a hard cap on individual fortunes and a guaranteed annual family income.
And people loved it; FDR, who was nowhere near as radical, considered him a threat. As he was.
The character of populism changed in the mid 20th century with the Joseph McCarthy era; populism became, and has remained, more right-wing in nature. But I reference Long in particular because I really, really think your modern-day Democratic Party could learn a lot from him - not in the way he used and abused power, but in his unapologetic advocacy of what he believed, his willingness to fight viciously for it, and in his insistence that his principles represented a better deal for the common man. ...
<snip>Good God, the likes of Long would have made mincemeat of the Republican effort to extend tax cuts for the wealthy at a time of economic crisis. He would have leapt into the fray practically frothing at the mouth, eager to destroy the Republicans on the issue, as they
can be destroyed on this issue.
Why is it the Republican Party seeks to pour even more money into the coffers of the nation’s rich at a time when the middle class and poor are suffering so? There is enough wealth in this great land to sustain all American families, but some families and the politicians who serve them insist it is in your best interests to allow great wealth to accumulate in the hands of the few! Give them millions more, for they don’t have enough; they shall never have enough, while the rest of the nation gets down upon its collective knees and begs for alms, for jobs, pleads with the plutocrats for sustenance, shedding its dignity in the process.I mean, the arguments are simple - and, I’m convinced, would be every bit as effective today as they were then.