Cargo Cult: Questions on the Latest Terrorist Threat

[yurbud]

I'm embarrassed that I didn't think of his two questions, though I did have one when Obama said we foiled the plot with the help of Saudi Arabia. Before 9/11, http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2008/03/foia-doc-shows-911commission-lied-about.html">they helped the hijackers according to the FBI and the http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2007/02/probe-this-sen-bob-graham-said-two-911.html">Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9/11, and http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2008/02/bandar-bushs-terror-threat-to-britain.html">when he was being investigated for bribery in Britain, Prince Bandar threatened them with terrorist attacks, and Tony Blair took it seriously enough to call off the investigation.

The other question is, if this plot had succeeded, and the bombs went off shortly before the election, what was the political outcome they expected? Obama has not radically changed Bush's approach in the war on terror. The drawdown of US troops in Iraq was forced on Bush by the Iraqis themselves, and Obama has already increased troop levels in Afghanistan. Helping the GOP win in the midterms would not change our foreign policy substantially apart from giving the GOP a louder platform to call for war on Iran.

First we were told that the recently intercepted package bombs sent, we are told, from Yemen, were targeted at synagogues in Chicago. Now we are being told that they were intended to blow up the cargo planes themselves. We are also told that the bombs' design shows the mark of a "highly sophisticated" operation by extremist Islamists, most likely al Qaeda.

All of which prompts one question. If you were indeed a "highly sophisticated" Islamist extremist operation wishing to blow up cargo planes bound for the United States with package bombs, would you really a) mail those bombs from Yemen, a country currently under intense counterterrorism scrunity by the United States, and b) address these packages, from Yemen, to Jewish institutions -- in Barack Obama's home city?

Either a) or b) alone would be enough to set alarm bells clanging all through the thick mesh of security systems that now overlay modern life. Put them together, and what you have is either a) the mark of a very unsophisticated, cack-handed, two-bit operation whose sporadic and isolated threats hardly justify a world-wide, never-ending, mass-killing, liberty-gutting, multi-trilliondollar war, or b) the mark of a highly sophisticated organization that wished to ensure maximum publicity for this attempted terrorist attack -- and even more publicity for its heroic thwarting ... especially on the eve of a national election, and after weeks of leaks and bad press about atrocities and corruption that call the whole Terror War ethos into question.

Points perhaps worth pondering in the coming weeks as we watch the ever-more profitable security mesh seize on this incident to call for ever-greater funding, and ever-greater measures of control over our lives.

http://www.chris-floyd.com/articles/1-latest-news/2041-cargo-cult-questions-on-the-latest-terrorist-threat.html

[katty]

1. CIA needs development execs to come up with better storylines

and execution--this UPS story is absurd.