Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Net Neutrality in danger more now than ever?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Bennyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 03:14 PM
Original message
Net Neutrality in danger more now than ever?
The FCC's push for Net Neutrality legislation suffered another setback on Tuesday, after 95 of the candidates who pledged their support for it lost their elections.

The Progressive Change Campaign Committee site has had a list of 95 candidates, all Democrats, listed on netneutralityprotectors.com/ as pledged supporters of Net Neutrality.

But, as CNN Money reports, all of them lost.

The FCC has been trying to expand its authority to regulate broadband internet providers, initially losing a court case in April. After that, it pushed Congress to pass legislation that would prevent the providers from blocking access to certain internet content, and force them to treat all web content providers equally.

Republicans have mostly been opposed to Net Neutrality, and the Tea Party even formed a coalition against it back in August, arguing that it hurts freedom.


READ MORE: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/11/all-95-candidates-who-pledged-support-for-net-neutrality-lost-on-tuesday.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Welcome to the World Wide Web, sponsored by Carl's Jr.
"Carl's Jr. Fuck you! I'm eating!"

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Everything is in danger now.
I'm more worried now than I was when w was Resident.

At this point I'll settle for the Doctors Oath: 'First do no harm'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's in danger roughly ever three and a half seconds
I've lost track of how many "this is your last chance to stand up for net neutrality" petitions I've signed.

Another one will be along in ... oh, here it is!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. lol, NOW, y'all remember what Republican govt is like n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "They're all the same." Oh, wait, they aren't? Oh, well, lets just focus on working as hard as we
can to undermine support for the guy that will have to block all the crap with his veto. He sucks. We might as well have a Republican in there because he is just the same as Republicans. Let's primary him even though that is a great way to damage a President and help ensure he loses re-election blah, blah, blah. Another great day on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. I suspect Net Neutrality was DOA regardless of whether Conservative Republicans
took control of the House, or Conservative Dems retained control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. I like Adam Green's response and I agree with him re: the referendum angle but I do wonder
if there was a somewhat more stealthy campaign aimed specifically at the supporters of Net Neutrality.



There is no sane political analyst in America who agrees with corporate shill Scott Cleland's assertion that Tuesday's Democratic wipeout was a 'national referendum' on Net Neutrality -- or had anything to do with Net Neutrality. The only significant thing about Net Neutrality in 2010 is that 95 Democratic challengers felt confident enough to actively tell voters they support this pro-consumer position while zero candidates across the country felt confident enough to actively tell voters they opposed Net Neutrality -- for the obvious reason that opposing the free and open Internet would be a ridiculously stupid political move.



Thanks for the thread, BennyBoy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nunyabidness Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Say goodbye to the internet as you knew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC