MSNBC's suspension of Keith Olbermann for making campaign donations without the approval of MSNBC brass is wise. An ump mustn't bet on baseball, and a legitimate news organization should not have one of its journalists - an anchor of its election-night coverage - play the role of a partisan investor while he's on the network payroll.
But, there's a "but" here - two "but"s, in fact.
One: Let's not pretend that everyone is playing by the same rules. Fox News as a company, as an employer, gave $1 million to the Republican Governors Association, making no mistake that the entire network is in one partisan corner. That was a huge mistake for which they ought to pay a price.
Two: Many journalists these days straddle the razor-wire fence between being straight reporters and being ideological commentators, spending as much if not more of their time spouting opinion as they do disseminating fact. Olbermann, Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews are liberal versions - tamer liberal versions, most of the time - of Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck, who make their livings throwing rhetorical bombs and supporting candidates, as is their right.
Read more:
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2010/11/05/2010-11-05_keith_olbermanns_suspension_by_msnbc_was_right__but_theres_a_double_standard.html#ixzz14YwNzQV9K&R please