Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Airport Security Red Flags Jumping Out all Over

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Independem Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 03:23 PM
Original message
Airport Security Red Flags Jumping Out all Over


When Fox News jumps on board and the rest of Propaganda Daily something pops up like red flags in a desert.

This is about privatizing Airport Security after the Tax Payers spent $billions on start up costs. Michael Chertoff comes to mind as he already has a conflict of interest in X-Ray Machines.

When Airport Security is privatized it will give companies a open book on your life history, from your medical records, phone to banking. When a Far Right Republican get control of your records they can pick and choose how and who they interrogate or screen.

Nov. 17, 2010 Chertoff-Lobbyists and Airport Scanner contracts all have an apparent connection.

The former Head of Homeland Security had an ulterior motive in promoting the Airport security scanning machines that people are objecting to so strongly. The company that makes the machine is now one of Chertoff’s clients but in the past under the Bush administration Chernoff was selling these machines to the government and to the Obama administration and they bought it hook, line and sinker.

http://www.politicolnews.com/chertoff-lobbyists-and-airport-scanners/
Chertoff Group

http://chertoffgroup.com/cgroup/

Chertoff Group Rapiscan Systems

Lawmaker To Airports: Do Away With TSA

ORLANDO, Fla. -- A Central Florida lawmaker who helped to write the bill that created the Transportation Security Administration now says it might be time to do away with the government entity at airports.
Rep. John Mica is reminding airports across the country that they have a choice to opt out of using the TSA.
Mica will soon chair the House Transportation Committee. He has sent letters to more than 150 airports, including Orlando International Airport, suggesting that they dump TSA screeners and instead hire private security.

http://www.wesh.com/r/25816724/detail.html

Private Screening Contract Awarded for Seven Airports in Montana

To date, the original PP5 airports are participating in SPP. These include San Francisco International; Kansas City International; Greater Rochester (N.Y.) International; Jackson Hole (Wyo.); and Tupelo (Miss.) Regional. In addition, Joe Foss Field in Sioux Falls, S.D., Key West (Fla.) International Airport, the Roswell International Air Center, and the Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County (Calif.) Airport are operating under SPP. TSA also has contracted with US Helicopter Corporation and McNeil Security, Inc., for screening operations to support airport shuttle services at the East 34th Street Heliport in New York City.

http://www.tsa.gov/press/releases/2009/0824.shtm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting do away with TSA and hire privte security...that will work won't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Check the Aviation boards.
They must have seen this coming. I swear there is one guy who seems to be at the epicenter of these clusterfucks, not matter where they happen in Central Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. I gave up after the first three disjointed sentences. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iaintnohick Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. TSA abuse
Inappropriate sexual contact is illegal in any context. Anyone who is touched where they shouldn't be touched should immediately get a real police officer and have the offender arrested on the spot. It is child abuse and illegal for a parent to give consent for a minor to be touched on the private parts. It is illegal for a minor to give consent to be touched on the private parts.
Under 18 CFR 2246, " 'sexual contact' means the intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC