I hardly ever agree with this guy, but maybe his forte is parenting not politics.
What is really ironic is his criticism of Amy Chua's BATTLE HYMN OF THE TIGER MOTHER is that it is based on a progressive premise: we work better together than alone, so social skills are crucial to maximize achievement. The kid browbeaten to get straight A's and study piano for three hours a day may play Carnegie Hall or get a Nobel Prize in chemistry, but will have a hard time leading others or even making the best contribution as a follower.
It's too bad the so-called center and right don't apply this thinking to their ideas for education reform, which are based on competition and individual effort rather than cooperation and a team approach to improve education. I guess the profit motive (for charter school private contractors and the real estate moguls who provide the facilities) trumps any other analysis.
Her critics echoed the familiar themes. Her kids can’t possibly be happy or truly creative. They’ll grow up skilled and compliant but without the audacity to be great. She’s destroying their love for music. There’s a reason Asian-American women between the ages of 15 and 24 have such high suicide rates.
I have the opposite problem with Chua. I believe she’s coddling her children. She’s protecting them from the most intellectually demanding activities because she doesn’t understand what’s cognitively difficult and what isn’t.Practicing a piece of music for four hours requires focused attention, but it is nowhere near as cognitively demanding as a sleepover with 14-year-old girls. Managing status rivalries, negotiating group dynamics, understanding social norms, navigating the distinction between self and group — these and other social tests impose cognitive demands that blow away any intense tutoring session or a class at Yale.
Yet mastering these arduous skills is at the very essence of achievement.
Most people work in groups. We do this because groups are much more efficient at solving problems than individuals (swimmers are often motivated to have their best times as part of relay teams, not in individual events). Moreover, the performance of a group does not correlate well with the average I.Q. of the group or even with the I.Q.’s of the smartest members.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/opinion/18brooks.html