Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

William Rivers Pitt: The Olbermann Era

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:01 PM
Original message
William Rivers Pitt: The Olbermann Era
Great article, as usual. :thumbsup:

http://www.truth-out.org/the-olbermann-era67123

The Olbermann Era

Tuesday 25 January 2011

by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

The Olbermann Era
Keith Olberman in Washington, DC, in 2009. (Photo: afagen)

snip//

All that aside, there is no doubt that Mr. Olbermann’s “Countdown” was something very special. In a polluted sea of corrupted corporate “news” brainwashing, his was a voice of loud, angry reason. He paved the way for the excellence of Rachel Maddow to make its own impressive mark on the TV “news” landscape. He spoke a great deal of truth that had not been heard on the airwaves for far too long. By modeling himself and his show after Edward R. Murrow, even going so far as to use Murrow's iconic "Good night, and good luck" sign-off at the end of every broadcast, he gave us a daily reminder that the "news" was not always like it is today, and that it can - nay, must - improve for the good of the republic.

His very existence became a thorn in the side of the corporation that owns his network, and the corporations behind all the other networks. He kicked some cash to a few Democratic candidates - Rep. Gabrielle Giffords being one - and it turned into a nine-day wonder of a debate about broadcasting standards and the hypocrisy of MSNBC's upper management. It still cracks me up when I think about it: here were these corporate network owners who scream bloody murder about money equaling speech, but when Olbermann exercised his constitutional right to participate in the political process by way of that particular brand of "speech," he got a two-day rip and a public scolding. The whole charade shamed his bosses deeply and publicly, and probably had more than a bit to do with his eventual departure from the network he pretty much single-handedly put on the map.

To me and so many others, he was a beacon of sanity during the bleak darkness of the Bush years. Remember the timeline here: the 2000 election catastrophe was followed by a ceaseless cable “news” refrain of, "This is an orderly transition of power, nothing to see here, go back to bed," which infuriated everyone who knew that particular game had been fixed. This was followed by the push for war in Iraq ballyhooed by every cable network - "Navy SEALS rock!" - until the bullets started flying and the IED's started going off. All throughout, the myriad scandals and crimes of the Bush administration went largely ignored and unreported...until Keith came along, reminding us that, "Today is the 521st day since the declaration of 'Mission Accomplished' in Iraq."

Mr. Olbermann was one of the only voices in broadcasting who openly discussed the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame by the Bush administration. When the 2004 election results in Ohio were corrupted by brazen manipulation and vote fraud, it was Olbermann who raised the loudest televised cry. It was Olbermann who, day after day, hammered the awful truth about the invasion and occupation of Iraq. And it was Olbermann who pounded home the fact that the Bush administration was little more than a deranged criminal enterprise that threatened the very fabric of the nation.

more...

http://www.truth-out.org/the-olbermann-era67123
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great tribute, Mr. Pitt. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R......Oberman was indeed a treasure.....He held them accountable
He made a diffderence....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Keith became a threat to the "big heist" and had to be eliminated. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "eliminating" him just validated his power
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 01:04 PM by grasswire
They are afraid of him -- and us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't believe that the heisters are actually "afraid" of Keith. They
are just taking care of their business by cutting him off before he does some damage to their
thievery. I was surprised the Keith lasted as long as he did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sixty_cycle_humm Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. It still hasn't fully hit me that he's gone
His show was what I had a TV for, other than coming here for my news he was the one voice I felt safe trusting and believing in.

Anyone need an old Zenith with no remote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Don't worry, he'll be back! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. your comment is better than any advertising slogan I've ever seen
"His show was what I had a TV for, other than coming here for my news he was the one voice I felt safe trusting and believing in."

That kind of honest statement can't be written by advertising geniuses.

He's not gone forever. Remember that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thank you for Pitt's usual great article. He was spot on!
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 01:47 PM by Frustratedlady
If I were Rachel or Ed, I would be checking out other opportunities. I got the feeling last night that Rachel wasn't feeling as secure as she normally comes off. I think their "foundation" took a whack and all of them are looking over their shoulder.

We need their voices, as well as articles like this one. May they continue to keep us informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC