Torture May Have Slowed Hunt For Bin Laden, Not Hastened It

[dtotire]

dan froomkin



First Posted: 05/ 6/11 03:48 PM ET Updated: 05/ 6/11 04:55 PM ET

Torture apologists are reaching precisely the wrong conclusion from the back-story of the hunt for Osama bin Laden, say experienced interrogators and intelligence professionals.

Defenders of the Bush administration’s interrogation policies have claimed vindication from reports that bin Laden was tracked down in small part due to information received from brutalized detainees some six to eight years ago.

But that sequence of events -- even if true -- doesn’t demonstrate the effectiveness of torture, these experts say. Rather, it indicates bin Laden could have been caught much earlier had those detainees been interrogated properly.

"I think that without a doubt, torture and enhanced interrogation techniques slowed down the hunt for bin Laden," said an Air Force interrogator who goes by the pseudonym Matthew Alexander and located Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, in 2006.


more:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/06/torture-may-have-slowed-h_n_858642.html

[forty6]

1. Thanks for posting this! I am hopeful we will

start whittling away at those advocates of water boarding when we start to get to look at the entire sequence of events over the past 10 years, and how Bush folk were really screwing it up.

[RufusTFirefly]

2. Must the Right have a monopoly on morality?

Regardless of the outcome, torture is wrong.