Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A President Adrift

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 12:03 PM
Original message
A President Adrift
A President Adrift: After a week of presidential humiliations and capitulations, Michael Tomasky suggests that Obama will soon pass the point where he can be taken seriously as a leader.




More dispiriting news, this time about the White House overturning the EPA’s proposed new rules on smog. That comes a few hours after the jobs report from Friday morning, one of the bleakest yet. And it comes a few days in advance of what everyone expects will be a small-thinking, modest, blah jobs speech by the president. It’s not only getting to the point where it’s getting hard to see him winning reelection. It’s getting to the point where it’s hard to imagine people taking him seriously for the remaining 14 months of his current term.

The smog decision is a real low. The story behind this includes the fact that, as Brad Plumer reports environmental groups were going to file a lawsuit in 2009 about Bush-era ozone rules, and the Obama administration told them, in effect, “Wait, don’t hassle us with a lawsuit, we’re going to propose stricter rules soon.” So the stricter rules were proposed, and the White House has now said, “Sorry, changed our mind.”

We can’t calculate yet how this will reverberate through the environmental world, but we can imagine. This is the kind of thing that sticks with people. A promise was made and broken. And you know how partisans say sometimes in anger that we’d have been better off with the other guy? They say it for effect and don’t actually mean it. But in this case, it’s literally true. Bush-proposed standards in 2008 were tougher than the 1997 standards under which companies will now operate. I doubt environmentalists will forget this one.

And not just environmentalists. Even the Center for American Progress—the leading Democratic think-tank, an organization that is very, very close to the administration—issued a statement criticizing this decision (apologies—it was emailed to me, but without a link). That may be a first for CAP, which called the decision “deeply disappointing” and said it “grants an item on Big Oil’s wish list at the expense of the health of children, seniors and the infirm.” And the timing of it could not be worse, coming at the end of a week that included a stupid unforced error (the speech fracas) and leaks indicating a set of small-bore proposals to be offered next week.

<snip>

http://readersupportednews.org/off-site-opinion-section/72-72/7289-a-president-adrift
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cilla4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I see it as this:
Either he really doesn't want to be re-elected (didn't he intimate as much?), and is perhaps ill.

OR there is ANY skill left in his strategy team, it is about timing.

Remains to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I do give his "advisers" a lot of "credit" for this debacle.
It was far from necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PonyJon Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Had you voted a STRAIGHT DEMOCRATIC TICKET in 2010 you would have little to snark about. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not sure who's snarking, or who your comments are directed at?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. define who *you* is toots?
Really, such outrage surely can be tracked, right? :sarcasm:

We'll wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. This is DU... We did.
The fact is that the Democratic Party does not stimulate the average voter and thus we lose. We will lose again in 2012 if they don't do something very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Go tell that to the Independent voters who deserted the party
in 2010, angry over the shift to the right, but not party loyalists enough to hold their noses the way most people here did.

Sad you are attempting, unsuccessfully since most people here are not easily fooled, to rewrite what happened in 2010. The Dem Leadership has also failed to take the lesson they should have taken from their loss of the House, and it WAS they who lost it. Failing to know the facts appears to be making it likely they will make the same mistake again in 2012, unless there is someone, somewhere in the administration, who can force them back to reality.

Most Progressive Dems held their seats in 2010. Who do you think voted for them?

Most of those who lost were Blue Dogs. Why do you think that happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkmusclmachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Adrift? Hell, Obama's capsized:
In shark infested waters. Maybe his BFF, Mr. Boner, will throw him a lifeline. Yeah, right...bi-partisanshit only goes in one direction!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. There was so much potential in 2008... and we got a dud for a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC