Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feldman: Bin Laden Fulfilled His One True Ambition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 06:39 AM
Original message
Feldman: Bin Laden Fulfilled His One True Ambition
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-06/osama-bin-laden-fulfilled-his-one-true-ambition-noah-feldman.html

Here is a bet about the decade since Sept. 11: Historians are going to be mystified by it.

First, the U.S. won the Cold War -- or at least it appeared to. Then, like the U.K. initiating the Industrial Revolution at the height of its global dominance, the U.S. jump-started the Information Revolution. A decade after the Berlin Wall came down, the U.S. seemed poised for another century of global domination through a combination of hard and soft power. We could even afford an extended legal fight over who the next president was going to be.

Now, another 10 years on, the U.S. remains the most significant superpower -- but its position looks increasingly shaky. Its hard power took a hit through the realization that it couldn’t, in fact, take over cantankerous countries and turn them into thriving democracies, no matter how much money was spent or how many noble American lives were sacrificed. China is rising, and U.S. willingness to defend Taiwan by force of arms - - once the centerpiece of the U.S. Pacific policy -- is increasingly in doubt.

As for American soft power, forget about it (or if you prefer, fuggedaboudit). Always a subtle idea that depended upon the theory that culture follows the sword, the very notion now looks like a relic of a more confident age. Those today who preach the benefits of soft power sound very much unlike its originator: Joseph Nye. For the Harvard University professor of government and former senior Defense Department official, the theory was an adjunct to power from the barrel of a gun. Today, its expositors sound more like they think soft power is a substitute for the real thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fuddnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Missed in the translation: We had no intention of supporting "thriving democracy".
Inverted Totalitarianism or Managed Democracy at best, Central American style death squads if necessary. As long as we get their oil and other natural resources. Anything else is bullshit.

Funny thing. People don't like being occupied by foreign invaders. No matter the pretenses of Democrazy we erect. We might buy that benevolent bullshit. They don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. As with all past empires
an outsized military footprint is the source of America's demise. When your biggest export is war.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. It was his one attainable ambition and he did achieve it
in the service of his other unattainable goal; global jihad.

He probably knew deep down he was pissing in the wind on that one, sitting there watching "Hos without Hijabs" on the DVD player in the compound. But he did clear the path for many bad things that neocons were dying to make happen in this country, no question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC