Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

¿Goodbye, Mediterranean Diet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 07:54 AM
Original message
¿Goodbye, Mediterranean Diet?
http://www.elpais.com/articulo/sociedad/Goodbye/Mediterranean/Diet/elpepusoc/20110905elpepusoc_4/Tes

Measuring dietary changes - especially those that reflect how healthy different diets are - has always been a challenge for nutritionists and statisticians. The sheer variety of 'good' diets makes it impossible to define a single ideal diet. Recently, however, the World Health Organization has defined a healthy diet by laying down how much each of the three major components of our diet should contribute to the total. For example, we should get 15%-30% of our daily calories from fats, 55%-75% from carbohydrates (of which no more than 10% should come from raw sugar), and 10%-15% from proteins. We should also eat at least 400 grams of fruit and vegetables a day. These guidelines, combined with data on food availability from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), show how well countries across the world have done in complying with these norms over the past 50 years.

Using simple mathematics and statistics, we can estimate how wide is the gap between the typical national diet of a country and the WHO norms. A country that, on average, conforms to the norms on all counts will have a 'Recommendation Compliance Index' of 1; the worst possible diet will show the index to be 0. In countries low on the index, diet-related disorders affect - or likely to affect - many more people than before, thereby imposing a heavier burden on public health care. The recommendation compliance index thus offers a new way to study how diets have been changing in different parts of the world and, more important, to predict the incidence of diet-related diseases.

However, the index can oversimplify by ignoring many important bits of information. First, the FAO data reflect only 'availability' of food (roughly the difference between food production and net exports plus other uses such as animal feed) and do not account for household wastage. Second, in focusing on quality - the composition of diet - the indicator ignores quantity - the total intake of calories, which is a clear pointer to excess weight as well as undernutrition. Third, the indicator

shows what is average for a country: a high score may mask unhealthy diets of a large proportion of its people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-11 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Using country averages is bs, as is ignoring total calories eaten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC