Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Fail: Why Are There So Many Airline Bankruptcies?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 07:55 AM
Original message
Air Fail: Why Are There So Many Airline Bankruptcies?

from Slate:



Air Fail
Blame Jimmy Carter for all the airline bankruptcies. Or better yet, thank him.

By Matthew Yglesias | Posted Thursday, Dec. 1, 2011, at 3:51 PM ET


American Airlines’ parent company, AMR Corporation, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Tuesday, surprising exactly no one. A major corporate bankruptcy is normally a bit of a shock, but there’s nothing shocking about bankruptcy in the American passenger air business, where filings are way more common than crashes. Frontier Airlines filed in 2008, Delta and Northwest both filed in 2005 (and later merged), and United and U.S. Airways filed in 2002 and then again in 2004. TWA went down in 2001 as part of an acquisition by the now-bankrupt American Airlines. Pan Am, of course, went out of business entirely 10 years before that, only to re-emerge as a short-lived television show about the glories of air travel in the era before constant bankruptcy. And those are only the big ones. All told there have been 189 airline bankruptcy filings in America since 1990. Why?

You can blame Jimmy Carter for the bankruptcies. Or perhaps you ought to thank him.

Airline bankruptcies are a bit unusual in that they’re aimed more at labor unions than at creditors. American Airlines is certainly burdened by debts, but it’s been a bad credit risk for long enough that most of its debt is “secured”—backed by physical assets like airplanes that can be repossessed if it tries to default. So there are some unsecured creditors who’ll lose out, but the real aim of the filing, in the words of S&P 500 analyst Philip Baggaley is to “emerge as a somewhat smaller airline with more competitive labor costs.”

American’s labor costs are uncompetitive because it didn’t go bankrupt a decade ago when everyone else was doing it. Instead the airline and its unions reached an agreement on moderate concessions that allowed it to avoid bankruptcy. That was a point of pride for years but laid the groundwork for the airline’s current problems. Having made pre-emptive concessions in the past that saved the company, American’s unions were understandably reluctant to agree to further givebacks even though American’s cost structure remained higher than its competitors. Bankruptcy gives the company new legal options to put the squeeze on its workforce. ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2011/12/blame_jimmy_carter_for_all_the_airline_bankruptcies_or_better_yet_thank_him_.html




Refresh | +8 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because air travel for the masses is fundamentally unsustainable as liquid fuels become expensive...
...and eventually, rare.

Soon, for most of us, it's gonna be trains and ocean liners until
someone invents the Transporter.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Airlines would not exist if the taxpayers were not dumping money into the air travel business
Edited on Fri Dec-02-11 08:25 AM by Kolesar
We pay for airports, we fund the FAA, we paid a $40 billion bailout in 2001, we even pay the tickets of people who fly from remote rural airports. For that matter, we pay the development costs of airplanes through the defense budget: the Boeing KC-135 became the 707 passenger jet.

So, my money is paying to bring tourist dollars to Disney World. F**k
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lex1775 Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Just a slight correction
The KC-135 didn't result in the 707. Both aircraft were offshoots of Boeing's 367-80 protoype which was originally designed to show the advantages of civilian commercial transport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ParkieDem Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You're only partly correct ...
... on the bailout, yes (although was it really $40 billion?)

The FAA is primarily funded through taxes on airline tickets and taxes on jet fuel. The FAA also provides some funding to airports, but a great deal of airport funding is via bonds or state/local governments.

You are correct on the crazy EAS program.

But, to a large extent, you only fund the air travel business via excise taxes if you fly. As far as your income taxes are concerned, this is a much smaller portion of the business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC