Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

wal-mart is larger than norway: exposing the myth of capital competition.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 12:22 PM
Original message
wal-mart is larger than norway: exposing the myth of capital competition.
http://www.nationofchange.org/wal-mart-larger-norway-exposing-myth-capital-competition-1322835390

Any epoch of cap­i­tal­ism al­legedly premised on com­pe­ti­tion is vis­i­ble only from the rearview mir­ror. It is a left­ist tru­ism that in the process of com­pe­ti­tion, cap­i­tal­ism de­stroys com­pe­ti­tion. Com­pe­ti­tion, there­fore, is trans­formed into its op­po­site: mo­nop­oly. Cap­i­tal­ism no longer sur­vives by en­larg­ing com­pe­ti­tion, but rather through its re­duc­tion.

The supreme out­come of the con­tem­po­rary glob­al­iza­tion of mo­nop­oly cap­i­tal has been an am­pli­fi­ca­tion of world ex­ploita­tion, poverty rates, wealth dis­par­i­ties, and food in­se­cu­ri­ties. Since the mid-1970s the rate of world growth has stalled by nearly 70%. And one con­se­quence of de­cel­er­at­ing rates of growth has been a turn to fi­nan­cial­iza­tion since about 1980 by giant firms un­able to find suf­fi­cient high re­turn in­vest­ment out­lets in pro­duc­tion. Large cor­po­ra­tions grad­u­ally began to rely on spec­u­la­tive in­vest­ments made pos­si­ble by highly lever­aged as­sets and as a re­sult have fo­mented fi­nan­cial crises of un­fath­omable pro­por­tions at a time when state sys­tems every­where are in­creas­ingly sub­ject to the va­garies of the “mar­ket” and are forced to sub­si­dize the fail­ures of cor­po­rate cap­i­tal­ism through tax­payer spon­sored “bailouts.” Lead­ers at na­tional, re­gional, and mu­nic­i­pal lev­els have begun to ame­lio­rate the re­sult­ing fis­cal crises by dis­in­vest­ing in so­cial ser­vices and cre­at­ing more re­gres­sive tax sys­tems, thereby in­ten­si­fy­ing the ef­fec­tive level of ex­ploita­tion. Hence, the in­ter­na­tion­al­iza­tion of mo­nop­oly cap­i­tal, rather than con­tribut­ing to the sta­bi­liza­tion of global sys­tems, is ag­gran­diz­ing crises in both the scarcely in­dis­tinct pri­vate and pub­lic sec­tors.

In­equal­ity, in all its re­pug­nance, has be­come deeper and more en­trenched. Today the rich­est 2% of adult in­di­vid­u­als own more than half of global wealth, with the rich­est 1% ac­count­ing for 40% of total global as­sets. Al­though the gap in per capita in­come be­tween the rich­est and poor­est re­gions of the world fell from 15:1 to 13:1dur­ing the golden age of Key­ne­sian­ism, it in­creased by 19:1 by 2002. And from 1970 to 2009 the per capita GDP of de­vel­op­ing coun­tries (ex­clud­ing China) av­er­aged a mere 6.3% of the per capita GDP of the G8 coun­tries (the United States, Japan, Ger­many, France, the United King­dom, Italy, Canada, and Rus­sia).
Refresh | +9 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
sam11111 Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. quibble- the word breaks are distracting
Good essay tho
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Monopolies will always emerge from market economies without certain kinds of regulation
This ought to be completely uncontroversial. Kind of like the demand-side economics ought to be completely uncontroversial, and yet here we are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. indeed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for posting this. I've long thought that capitalism was a form of propaganda
meant to benefit those in big business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Walton family
has more money than the bottom third of our citizens. Yes, that one family has more money than 100 million US citizens.

Let them eat food stamps and get health care from the taxpayers! The Walton family disgusts me....to call them pigs is an insult to the pig.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kemah Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wal Mart Employees are subsidized by tax payers
Most Wal Mart employees work part-time jobs and get minimum wage. At that rate most of them qualify for food stamps and medicaid. That's how Wal Mart gets people to work for such low wages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC