Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What’s Progressive About Camping in Public Places?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 01:29 PM
Original message
What’s Progressive About Camping in Public Places?
Randy Shaw, Beyondchron.org

Occupy Wall Street’s seizure of a private park within steps of the New York Stock Exchange was brilliant. And the setting up of temporary encampments in other cities as a show of solidarity and as recruitment/organizing centers also made sense. But after the camping strategy got Occupy on the national map, what is progressive or strategically savvy about insisting on permanent campgrounds in public spaces? It's not as if camping is necessary to remind people about the federal government’s failure to address homelessness – nobody walking through the nation’s major cities can escape this fact. And this message could be sent through a single tent and accompanying information table. Occupy is about more than increased homelessness, and these battles over public camping divert attention from the movement's goals by pitting city officials against campers while Wall Street and big banks remain out of view. And as progressives criticize the privatization of urban land, turning public spaces over to a small number of campers is hardly “progressive.”

full: http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=9738
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's progressive is shutting up and letting the politicians do politics..
After all, they are specialists and know more about government than the ordinary citizen.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dtexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why attack what has worked?
Criticizing the success and dedication of occupiers is not at all progressive.

unrec
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, of course progressives should just shut up and eat the shit sandwiches
that have so generously been bestowed upon them by their elected representatives.

After all, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength. Only through our collective obedience can we ever hope to achieve any of our ideals.




And, for the OP, :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They should be occupying the front steps of the stock exchange, not camping out in some park.
What they started out doing made a great deal of sense. What they are evolving into makes no sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. They are continuing to evolve
Capturing and holding turf is not the point, as you'd know if you'd been following it closely.

They are now showing up at foreclosure auctions and fouling them up. They are joining with labor unions in strikes.

Besides, they'd have been nothing but bloody stains on the pavement had they come anywhere near the NYSE. Instead, they chose a privately held park and managed to educate a whole country.

That is damned special.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AmericaIsGreat Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Great idea
Then they get kicked out and pepper sprayed in about 30 seconds.

Wherever allows them to stay the longest while getting exposure is the best place. They'd be run out from the steps of the stock exchange immediately. That would make no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I think we all know they'd be shot as terrorists for doing that. And yes,
I am serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Exposure and
awareness!

That's only the first step in an effort to counter the mass-hallucination that is the LSD of mass media and state propaganda. Physical bodies occupying actual coordinates in space-time can be a visceral counterpoint to the hyper-reality of the corporate-crafted Simulation.

What other response, at this juncture, is possible in that respect? There have been many progressives working with and within the behemoth of the MIC for decades. While they are to be admired and thanked, the frustration of struggling with an evolving, increasingly aggressive and coercive neo-liberal agenda is not yielding progressive results, as anyone with eyes can see.

For that matter, why do progressives post here? Are we simply here to commiserate and preach to the choir? I wouldn't be here if I felt that our communication and expression, as well as our camaraderie, was merely an exercise in abstraction. While merely talking without action may actually be dis-empowering, that would only be the case if ideas and influence had no impact whatsoever. We tend to inform each other here and then inspect and discuss the information.

Everything we create and use starts with ideas. Where we live, our cities, these computers we are using did not just appear out of nowhere. We might want to be mindful of where ideas start and how they can eventually blossom into social and physical reality.

The idea of Occupy is taking shape and patience and support are a way to gain some form of momentum and have more of something tangible rather than more of the same, encroaching imprisonment in the dominant ideology of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Putting civil rights clearly above property rights. That's enough reason for me, never mind OWS
Edited on Tue Dec-06-11 02:14 PM by saras
When we respond to the phrase "property rights" the same way we'd respond to the phrase "white man's rights", then we can move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC