Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Big Dog embarrasses Repuke and says we need to "beat their brains out."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:08 AM
Original message
Big Dog embarrasses Repuke and says we need to "beat their brains out."
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 12:09 AM by unfrigginreal
This may have been posted previously but in case it hasn't it's damn good reading.

Big Dog is starting to see things as a lot of us are in that we HAVE to fight for what we believe against these neo-fascists. Anyway enjoy the article...his comments are on page 2 toward the end.

http://www.newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/media/columns/medialife/n_9121/index.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. He is human after all
A person can only keep so much bottled up for so long. I'm surprised that he didn't explode sooner and more violently. I wish there was a transcript of the whole thing because I think that he could give the Dems some pretty harsh talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. this sounds great
I seriously hope this turns up on C-Span.

That repuke sounds like a total schmuck:

When Clinton took questions, a young man from a technology company who identified himself as chairman of Bush-Cheney 2004 in California said he was offended by Clinton’s partisanship. To which Clinton, without hesitation, and with some kind of predatory gleam in his eye, said, “Good!”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It showed up here and that is important, too.
We are supposed to be above that petty partisan stuff. But I am glad he reacted. It gives me hope that we have the comeback kid ready to go out there and take 'em on.

Before the convention, the candidates each have their own following. But, like many others, I haven't committed yet.

I can rally behind the last legit president until the party decides who will be next. Lead on Bill, let's get this country on the right path to the return of peace and prosperity. Help pave the way for a REAL leader so we can get rid of this war monger and his neo-clone profiteers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Above petty partisan stuff?
We are in a war with the repukes. It should be fought like the Russian front. Take no prisoners and shot the wounded.
The repukes claim moral high ground, but they have no morals. No one should ever forget what is a stake. The pink tutu Senate Democrats have, and they are an endangered specie. The Dems should look on the struggle as the knife fight scene from "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid." There are no rules in a knife fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is there an embargo?
All I've seen is the one word quote. I'd like to hear exactly what he said beyond just "good".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. He didn't need to say anything besides "Good"...
the message was loud and clear that we're not going to take your bullshit anymore and you can expect tit for tat! In other words, partisanship is a two way street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Clinton was good at that
And that is the difference between him and the dems we see now. Even during the Jennifer Flowers thing, he always had a counterattack on the repubs. Yes, testosterone does fuel politics and we should be ready, willing, and able to use it on the Bushies.

The gloves are off now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spielino Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. You are 180 degrees wrong on this
Can I tell you when the Democrats lost the 2000 election? It was on the night of August 17, 1998 when President Clinton went on television to discuss his testimony re: Monica earlier that day. The American people were expecting and would have been accepting of an unequivocal admission to and contrite apology for the affair with Lewinsky. Instead, what they got was a half-hearted expression of regret for an unspecified 'mistake' coupled with a vigorous slam of Starr. Blame Harry Thomasson if you like, but that was the moment that killed the Dems for 2000. The Senate may have let him off, but the public didn't and took it out on Gore who should have and otherwise WOULD have won it by 20 points, particularly given the fantastic economy at the time.
There are times when it is good to be pugnacious. But I would never ever look to Clinton's example again after what his actions cost the Democratic Party three years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. what about the 1998 elections?
what about Newt Gingrich resigning?

How do you reconcile these with your theory that Clinton killed the dems in Aug. 1998?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spielino Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Nothing to reconcile
Newt quit because Flynt exposed his affair. Unrelated.

Dems picked up five seats in 1998, all right, but I think the American people were waiting to see what the Senate would do to Clinton. When they let him walk, in January of 1999, I think that's when people decided to take matters into their own hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. You're being a bit simplistic about this

The Democratic party was in disarray for years before Clinton. The more I read about the Clinton years, the more I'm convinced that the hard right would have gotten him for something; if not Monica Lewinsky, we would have been "outraged" about something else.

As for Gore, I'm convinced the press (and his handlers inability to deal with the press) cost him the 2000 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Wow, a holy Joe supporter says Clinton's evil lost 2000 election
there's a suprise! I say Gore lost the 2000 election when he selected Holy Joe as a running mate. There was no ground swell of support for Holy Joe. Al wanted to be 'his own man' so he selected a twit who had denounced Clinton from the Senate floor.

"Hi, my name is Joe Lieberman, and I represent the Republican wing of the Democratic Party."

"Hi, my name is Joe Lieberman, and I want to make sure there are at least two Republicans running for President in 2004."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Actually,
he said a lot more. I read it somewhere, I can't remember. Either MWO, or Buzzflash. There was an entire article about this elite gathering of the famous and wealthy liberals, invited there by Walter Issacs for a three-day symposium. The headliner in the article was the blistering retort given by Bill in response to a pug techie. The article was written by one of the elite journalists that attended by invitation only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. OH YEAH,
and he kicked his butt too.

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. GOOD!
We need to remember what Ted Rall said. "It's the ferocity, stupid!":grr:

I bet he'd have a lot to say about the power grabs in texas and Calif. also:spank:

Any D over any r in '04 (or in '03)!:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC