Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deficit indicates asset mismanagement (Atlanta Journal fries *Co)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:40 PM
Original message
Deficit indicates asset mismanagement (Atlanta Journal fries *Co)
http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0904/08deficit.html

(free registration or try www.bugmenot.com)

The record $422 billion budget deficit is a sign of fiscal irresponsibility and disdain for nation's future.

In his book "The Price of Loyalty," former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill recounts a troubling conversation back in 2002 with his good friend Dick Cheney. When O'Neill warned the vice president that the federal budget deficit was growing so large that it threatened the nation's long-term economic health, Cheney curtly dismissed the issue as unimportant.

"Reagan proved deficits don't matter," Cheney said, leaving O'Neill, a traditional conservative Republican and former CEO of Alcoa, too dumbfounded even to respond. A month later, Cheney fired O'Neill from the Cabinet.

In their public statements, of course, top Bush administration officials have continued to mouth the traditional platitudes about the importance of fiscal responsibility, as if there had been no change in Republican philosophy from the days not so long ago when the party was pushing a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget. But the gap between their rhetoric and their record is discouraging.

<snip>

Trying to buy its way into popularity with voters, the Bush White House has overseen the largest increase in nondefense federal spending since the 1960s. Then there's the $200 billion expense of our optional war in Iraq and a subsequent occupation that most assuredly has not been paid for by Iraqi oil revenues, as the administration had suggested. And while government spending has boomed, the Bush administration has simultaneously slashed revenue through a series of tax cuts. This is the only time in U.S. history that taxes have been cut in a time of war, when we are all supposed to be willing to sacrifice for the common good.

...more sizzling reading...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent
It pisses me off to no end that back in 1999/2000 it looked like we have finally tamed the deficit demons for the first time in my lifetime, then Bush F's it all up. You can't use 9/11 as an excuse for every economic failure of this administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're dissembling here...
This wasn't the "largest increase in nondefense federal spending since the 1960s." It was the greatest inability to pay for normal appropriations because of the tax cuts, combined with huge increases in defense spending.

A carefully crafted lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. yes, you are correct -
yet, for the AJC to say a single bad word about *Co is pretty amazing in and of itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC