A Disgraceful CampaignSpeech(GOP should spend on Security-not on tax cut

[papau]

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/09/opinion/09thu2.html

A Disgraceful Campaign Speech(Bush should spend more on Security, less on tax cuts)

here are some things a presidential campaign should steer clear of, through innate good taste, prudence or just a sensible fear of a voter backlash. We'd have thought that both the Kerry and Bush camps would instinctively know that it would be appalling to suggest that terrorists were rooting for one side or another in this race. But Vice President Dick Cheney seemed to breach that unspoken barrier this week in Des Moines. If John Kerry was elected president, Mr. Cheney warned the crowd, "the danger is that we'll get hit again." In a long, rather rambling statement, he said the United States might then fall back into a "pre-9/11 mind-set" that "these terrorist attacks are just criminal acts."

At the very best, Mr. Cheney was speaking loosely and carelessly about the area in this campaign that deserves the most careful and serious discussion. It sounds to us more likely that he stepped across a line that the Bush campaign team had flirted with throughout its convention, telling his audience that re-electing the president would be the only way to stay safe from another attack.

There is a danger that we'll be hit again no matter who is elected president this November, as President Bush himself has said on many occasions. The danger might be a bit less if the current administration had chosen to spend less on tax cuts for the wealthy and more on protecting our ports, securing nuclear materials in Russia and establishing an enforceable immigration policy that would keep better track of people who enter the country from abroad.

Immigration and homeland security strategies are policy fights, fair game for a political campaign. What's totally unacceptable is to tell the American people that the mere act of voting for your opponent opens the door to a terrorist attack. For Mr. Cheney to suggest that is flat wrong. There was a time in this country when elected officials knew how to separate the position from the person. The American people, we're sure, would like to return to it.

[sui generis]

1. another critical thinking moment:

if nobody can run against the wartime president without supporting the terra-ists, then gosh let's abolish term limits while we're at it. In fact, let's make the democratic party illegal.

This administration is clearly on drugs.

[MissMarple]

2. Bush&Co think the American people are stupid and gullible.

They don't regret saying that at all

[Shallah Kali]

3. plus they know when scared enough even smarter people do stupid things

Too many Americans have a phobic fear of terrorists attacking them and can be stampeded into doing whatever the Bush Admin. wants. They are trying to portray Bush as a confident, competent leader so people won't 'change horses while crossing a stream' when in fact he is the head lemming leading the rest of the pack right off a cliff.

[EST]

4. After half a century of observing people,

I am going to have to agree-many are.

[90-percent]

5. terroism and voting

I blame those that voted for Bush in 2000 for 9/11!

If he's President during the next attack, at least he'll be practiced in how to react better this time! We can look forward to Bush not being so deer-in-the-headlights!



-85% Jimmy