Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PNAC Neo-Con Agenda and Evidence of Pentagon Frame-Up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 11:18 PM
Original message
PNAC Neo-Con Agenda and Evidence of Pentagon Frame-Up
Edited on Mon Aug-25-03 11:21 PM by Dancing_Dave
The most enlightening Democratic Underground discussion I ever saw was the now archived responses to PNAC. PNAC set the agenda for the Bush Administration, and it demanded a new "Pearl Harbor" to "catalyze" the U.S. into a military state bent on controlling the Earth and the Space around it. This arrogant idea has already led to disaster, and we'll be experiencing plenty more disaster until we get off the course that people like Cheney and Rumsfeld have set.

Here's some of the early DU discussion of the PNAC Neo-Con Agenda:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/duforum/DCForumID12/3021.html

9/11 certainly worked as their New Pearl Harbor. But did they really set it up for that purpose? This article published at Physics911.org http://www.physics911.org/index.php/docs/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=29&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 , along with all the evidence in the footnotes, is meant to show that 9/11 was an organized propaganda spectacle directed by neo-con organized crime in the Bush Administration.

There is really a lot of conflict within the Pentagon these days. Lot's of people working there don't really like Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz's neo-con clique. 9/11 made this clique very powerful, but their disasterous, deceptive and corrupt Iraqi operations have put them on rather thin ice again. Another 9/11 might not work on people who are close enough to see how Rummy works, and would prefer that their office space was not the target of a very high precision incendiary weapon...do they always have to hang around Rummy to make sure they are not on the side of the building that gets hit?

I am trying to include a little wit and diplomacy here, like some of the writers on Europe's most Enlightening site critiquing Neo-Conservatism and it's implementation begining on 9/11/2001, http://reseauvoltaire.net But the conflicts created all over by the Neo-Con take over are serious and disasterous and will just keep getting more disasterous until we finally expose the terrible truth about PNAC and their New Pearl Harbor, and remove them from their extremely powerful positions in the U.S Government today.

These three quotes from Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld should help us keep this discussion focused:

From 9/10/2001:
« The adversary's closer to home. It's the Pentagon bureaucracy. Not the people, but the processes. Not the civilians, but the systems. Some might ask, how in the world could the Secretary of Defense attack the Pentagon in front of its people ? To them I reply, I have no desire to attack the Pentagon ; I want to liberate it. We need to save it from itself. The men and women of this department, civilian and military, are our allies, not our enemies. »
« Remarks as Delivered by Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld »
But not everyone appreciates being "liberated" by a fighter plane or missile...ask any Iraqi!

Early the next morning, 9/11//2001, Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld was again sharing his prophetic vision:
« Inside, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld had some people in to talk about missile defense and the risk that terrorism seen in the past would happen again. "Let me tell ya," he said, "I've been around the block a few times. There will be another event." Two minutes later, a plane smashed into the first World Trade Center tower and proved him right. »
« A day beyond belief for all America », par Calvin Woodward, Associated Press, 16 septembre 2001.

But perhaps he did not really need to be so Prophetic -- as Secretary of Defence, he was in a position to make sure the whole scenario happened just the way the PNAC agenda needed it to!

By that afternoon, the neo-conservative Regime was in place:
« Senator Levin, you and other Democrats in Congress have voiced fear that you simply don't have enough money for the large increase in defense that the Pentagon is seeking, especially for missile defense, and you fear that you'll have to dip into the Social Security funds to pay for it. Does this sort of thing convince you that an emergency exists in this country to increase defense spending, to dip into Social Security, if necessary, to pay for defense spending -- increase defense spending ? »

And until we are fearless enough to expose the terrible hidden truth, this catastrophic Regime will remain in power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. A link for comprehensive critique of the total Bush Regime:
Edited on Mon Aug-25-03 11:39 PM by Dancing_Dave
Perhaps my essential and compact little article will make more sense against the background of this comprehensive critique of the Bush Regime: http://www.oilempire.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, I have
written somewhat about PNAC here and their in a few columns and articles. It's funny how you can start piecing things together by listening and reading about people and events here and there. Rummy might say something, then some general might come out with an interview, then all of a sudden Bill Kristol writes a column about god knows what and none of it seems to fit together until you learn about PNAC. It really centralizes everything. I'm nearly obsessed with it. Thanks for posting these, I'll check them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. L'acte fondateur du régime Bush
Focussing on Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld, this classic article shows how the Neo-Con men founded their regime and scenario of endless conflict on 9/11/2001. Rumsfeld clearly saw his big day comming on 9/11, he knew the whole plan, and by that afternoon he was getting people into the new Regime...a regime which is proving disasterous for the whole Earth!

http://www.reseauvoltaire.net/article9523.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. awesome!
:toast:

feel free to submit your articles to GFP as well :hi:

http://new.globalfreepress.com/submit.pl

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC