Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would the 'real' Ten Commandments please step forward?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 09:38 AM
Original message
Would the 'real' Ten Commandments please step forward?
Edited on Tue Aug-26-03 09:40 AM by kgfnally
Interesting article at sfgate.com today:

Let's say the Supreme Court of the United States allows the chief justice of the great state of Alabama to keep his 2-ton monument to the Ten Commandments in his office building in Montgomery.

Next question:

Which Ten Commandments?

You've got your Jewish Ten Commandments, your Catholic Ten Commandments, your Lutheran Ten Commandments, your Charlton Heston Ten Commandments, your King James Bible Ten Commandments, your New Revised Standard Version Ten Commandments, and they don't all agree as to which commandment is which -- or what they really mean.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/08/26/MN274126.DTL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks...Good stuff
Rove is looking for a simple low cost wedge issue. I'm sure in the next year we'll more crap like this including flag burning, gay marriage amendment, and the other right wing low brow emotional issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. the gay marriage amendment
would bite them in the ass. You don't prohibit something that's already prohibited. By adopting a campaign to add a marriage amendment to the Constitution, they're effectively stating that the Constitution currently allows gay marriage.

Neat, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Interesing - never thought of it that way
Kind of like how if Faux News would have continued the Franken law suit they would have had to proven they were "Fair and Balanced" - something they probably can't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why can't they just post the "Golden Rule"?
I would be satisfied if the would "do unto others as they would have them do unto them". Why,
I would even be happy if they would post the Silver Rule of Confucius: "If you don't like what is
being done to you, don't do it to someone else". That would be a step in the right direction, too.
No matter which 10 Commandments we pick, they are not going to be the best rule of behavior in
this day and age. If love is not the motivation, something is wrong. Obviously, Compassionate Conservatism
is not based on love, agape or anyother kind.

Garrison Keillor had a great line......Compassionate Conservatism will sentence a child to death for
murder but will grant him/her a wish before they are executed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshdawg Donating Member (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-03 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bill Maher made a thoughtful statement,
Only two commandments refer to any law and yet this monstrosity is in a federal courthouse. Hmmmmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC