------------
Fascism Anyone?
by
Laurence W. Britt
(The following article is from Free Inquiry magazine, Volume 23, Number 2.)
Free Inquiry readers may pause to read the ÒAffirmations of Humanism: A Statement of PrinciplesÓ on the inside cover of the magazine. To a secular humanist, these principles seem so logical, so right, so crucial. Yet, there is one archetypal political philosophy that is anathema to almost all of these principles. It is fascism. And fascismÕs principles are wafting in the air today, surreptitiously masquerading as something else, challenging everything we stand for.
~ snip ~
For the purpose of this perspective, I will consider the following regimes: Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, FrancoÕs Spain, SalazarÕs Portugal, PapadopoulosÕs Greece, PinochetÕs Chile, and SuhartoÕs Indonesia.
~ snip ~
Analysis of these seven regimes reveals fourteen common threads that link them in recognizable patterns of national behavior and abuse of power. These basic characteristics are more prevalent and intense in some regimes than in others, but they all share at least some level of similarity.
1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism. From the prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins, the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious. Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.
~ snip ~
4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism. Ruling elites always identified closely with the military and the industrial infrastructure that supported it. A disproportionate share of national resources was allocated to the military, even when domestic needs were acute. The military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was used whenever possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations, and increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.
~ snip ~
6. A controlled mass media. Under some of the regimes, the mass media were under strict direct control and could be relied upon never to stray from the party line. Other regimes exercised more subtle power to ensure media orthodoxy. Methods included the control of licensing and access to resources, economic pressure, appeals to patriotism, and implied threats. The leaders of the mass media were often politically compatible with the power elite. The result was usually success in keeping the general public unaware of the regimesÕ excesses.'
~ snip ~
(Also mentioned, and discussed in greater detail in the article:
2. Disdain for the importance of human rights.
3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause.
5. Rampant sexism.
7. Obsession with national security.
8. Religion and ruling elite tied together.
9. Power of corporations protected.
10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated.
11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts.
12. Obsession with crime and punishment.
13. Rampant cronyism and corruption.
14. Fraudulent elections.)
~ snip ~
Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a constitution, a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not.
~ snip ~
-----------------
Read the whole article here:
http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/britt_23_2.htm-----------------
Ladies and gentlemen, it has to be admitted: fascism has finally reached our shores.