<<...Hinzman argues he is being asked to participate in an illegal war. At one level, this is a practical necessity; Canada does not usually grant refugee status to people simply because they have broken the law in their home countries. Hence, if Hinzman wants to stay, he has to prove that the law he broke is fundamentally illegal.
Yet, Hinzman also puts the Canadian government in a difficult position. His claim is not just self-serving. It is also correct according to international law experts and, in fact, was implicitly used by Ottawa as its justification for not joining Bush's war...
The reason, as University of Toronto law professor Jutta Brunée explains, is that since 1945 international law has been quite clear: With two key exceptions, war is illegal. Those exceptions are wars conducted in self defence and wars authorized by the Security Council.
In an affidavit filed on behalf of Hinzman, Brunée points out that the war on Iraq fits neither category...>>
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1101726846131&call_pageid=968256290204&col=968350116795