Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can't BELIEVE I read this on NewsMax!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
tekriter Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 09:40 AM
Original message
Can't BELIEVE I read this on NewsMax!
http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/4/155602.shtml

Excerpt:
"We spent a fortune attacking a country that had done us no harm, killing tens of thousands of its people and giving the United States a black eye as an aggressor that starts wars on the basis of lies and disinformation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rats deserting the sinking shit
You wouldn't have thought Newschmux had spent the last year and a half pimping for this debacle, would you?

But then dittomonkeys don't really have enough attention span for any sort of logical consistency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. sinking shit, or ship?
It works either way. I like the idea of the Bush Junta as a floating turd raft, infested with diseased rats that are jumping off because they can't stand the smell... Sounds like a perfect metaphor to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. STINKING SHIP
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. The metaphor fits, don't it?
How many Newschmux readers will be too stupid to remember Ruddy and his gang were cheerleading for the war up to now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is truly amazing
Here here for NewsMax. We should accept support wherever we can get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Can there be any question...
That The Scaife Brigade has read the handwriting on the wall and has made ready to toss Chimpington over the side, in the hopes of slowing the sinking of the neo-con ship?

The garbage scow "Hubris" that has run aground on the shoals of Nemesis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. The garbage scow "Hubris" that has run aground on the shoals of Nemesis.
Eu Legei!

Well Said!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. bio on Paul Craig Roberts can be found here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grins Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Interesting bio...
That's an interesting bio. My first thought was, "Has this guy ever held a real job?" I know. I know. That's smarmy (sp?). But the way it is written suggests that this very bright person went from his BS, to his MS, to Ph.D to academia, to government and back to academia. My question is, if he was a democrat, would the Repubs then call him a "pointy-headed" (academic/conservative/whatever)? I like the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. This has to be a satire or parody!!
:wtf: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick of Bullshit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Get this last line:
Edited on Fri Sep-05-03 10:27 AM by Sick of Bullshit
"It is time Bush replaced his delusional neocon advisers with wise people of integrity."

Excuse me, Dr. Roberts, but BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

The reason why the doofus in the White House surrounds himself with idiotic neocons who lack integrity is because HE HIMSELF has ABSOLUTELY NONE! ZERO! ZIP! ZILCH!

Honest men prefer the company of other honest men. Crooks prefer the company of other crooks. It's as simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
priller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. And an impotent, insecure man-child wants
to be surrounded with fawning sycophants, where seldom is heard a discouraging word.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Wonder who they mean?
Dan Burton?
Bob Barr?
Newt Gingrich?
Bill Bennett?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Firstly . . .
Thanks for the link, I'm still laughing . . .

Secondly, someone needs to stealth post this over at freerepublic and get their reactions :) :) :)

This could be really, really funny.

E
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Another snippet
"Sooner or later, even the brain-dead are going to realize that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, was not a threat to us (until neocons got us mired down there) and had nothing to do with the events of Sept. 11."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Even a blind hog finds an acorn occasionally n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. Another article linked from that: "President (sic) Bush is not a Neo-con"
Edited on Fri Sep-05-03 12:55 PM by berry
It's equally entertaining--an attempt to get Bush* separated from any blame for what's happened. This is purely delusional--but if it splits the GOP and saves lives in Iraq, well that's good anyway. What interested me especially in the article was that now they're backing away from the building-democracy theme (the 2nd cover excuse for attack, after WMD) and back to "the war on terrorism." It's dizzying, all this spinning of spin.

http://www.newsmax.com/cgi-bin/printer_friendly.pl?page=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/4/212858.shtml

President Bush Is Not a Neocon
David Limbaugh
Friday, Sept. 5, 2003

<<It may surprise you to know that there are those of us out here (I'd call us mainstream conservatives) who are hawkish against terrorism and bullish on Israel, yet not interested in creating an American empire. Our guiding principle is protecting America's strategic national interests. If that means we sometimes have to attack other nations, even preemptively, so be it. We are far from being isolationists, but we are just as far from being imperialists.

If I'm correct that President Bush more closely resembles us mainstream conservatives here, then I think it's safe to say that he isn't looking to conquer other countries for sport – or even to make them safe for democracy or Israel. He isn't even looking to take on the other two Axis of Evil countries: North Korea and Iran.

Rather, he's focused on going after anti-American terrorists and their supporters and enablers – just as he's told us from the beginning. That could lead us into Iran, North Korea or even Saudi Arabia (though our curious relationship with Saudi Arabia is another matter altogether).

Bush's opponents – at least the paleocons – would have much less anxiety about him if they understood that he really isn't a neoconservative. He's a neo anti-terrorist.<end>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. Note to Self
Not paying the PR crowd was a big mistake
Firing the PR crowd was even worse.

Why won't they simply accept Enron stock options in lieu of cash?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-03 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. Roberts wrote a wonderful article called A Wreckless Path
Prior to the invasion of Iraq.

In the article he touched on the possibility of impeachment for Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfxgillis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. I was about to point that out.
Roberts was (paleo-?) or (libertarian-?) conservative opponent of the Iraq adventure from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-03 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. priceless quote
"Sooner or later, even the brain-dead are going to realize that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, was not a threat to us (until neocons got us mired down there) and had nothing to do with the events of Sept. 11."

nuff said

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC