America is not yet tyrannous, but the past four years under the Bush administration have ushered in some ominous trends.
By Scott D. O’Reilly
At America’s founding, a woman stopped to ask Benjamin Franklin what kind of government we would soon have. “A republic,” the founding father replied, “if you can keep her.”
As historian Gore Vidal notes, Franklin was certain that America’s grand experiment would someday end in tyranny. Is that day upon us? I’m sure Franklin would turn in his grave at the irony that a nation that cast off the yoke of an oppressive hereditary monarchy -- exemplified by the mad King George -- now finds itself in the thrall of yet another hereditary dynasty headed in recent years by a father and son pair of American aristocrats, both named, as fate would have it, George.
Contrary to some caricatures, America is not yet tyrannous. However, the past four years under the Bush administration have ushered in some ominous trends: one hijacked election; a radical right cabal that controls all three branches of government; journalists facing prison time for not divulging their sources (what has happened to freedom of the press under the First Amendment?); and an administration that has demonstrated a selective disregard for the Constitution, international laws and agreements, not to mention “a decent respect to the opinions of mankind.”
That the American people, by a slim margin, essentially endorsed the administration’s course in 2004 is discouraging, but it should not be surprising; civilizations and societies have frequently embraced disastrous leaders in times of strife, danger, and challenge. If the past is prologue, the future portends many perils on the path America is taking. Let me explain why.
The historian Arnold Toynbee studied the life cycle of civilizations. Of the roughly two-dozen great civilizations --Sumerian, Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Inca, etc. -- all but our present Western civilization has met its fate. There is a common pattern, Toynbee argues, by which civilizations flower, mature, and ultimately disintegrate because they fail to address challenges in creative and constructive ways.
snip
http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=959&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0