|
I was trying to be nice and sound sort of conservative.
Sir,
I noticed this morning your "reporter" covering the democratic presidential campaigns in Iowa made one false statement and overall did a very poor job of reporting. He said that Howard Dean encouraged Americans not to prejudge Osama Bin Laden. What Dean actually said was that as president, he would not pre-determine the guilt or innocence of anyone prior to the conclusion of a trial, in order to preserve the rule of law. President Bush said something similar. . A fair and balanced presentation of this story would have compared the comments of Bush and Dean, and demonstated that they were very similar, rather than misstating and demonizing a rather mainstream statement by Dean
Your "reporter" also referred to "whoppers" by the Dean and Clark campaign. Should reporters classify statements as "whoppers"? If a reporter wants to disprove the statements of a specific candidate, that is legitimate. But categorizing their statements as "whoppers" without providing proof that said statements are false is poor reporting. I am assuming by "whoppers" the reporter is trying to say lies. If he wants to call the democratic candidates liars, he should simply do so and be straight forward about what he thinks.
I would hope that Fox will not abandon its pledge to report and let us decide. The coverage of the democratic candidates seems as if Fox has already decided and is not brave enough to come forward and say it.
I hope you will answer my letter and address my concerns. Thank you for your time.
Yours,
Derek Gullage Pasadena, CA
|