Anybody surprised that Bush hasn't changed the succession act...
Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-11-04 02:56 AM
Original message |
| Anybody surprised that Bush hasn't changed the succession act... |
|
So that Asscroft or Rummy come right after Chenney. I mean you can never be too careful in these "dangerous" times. Wouldn't want the presidency falling to a non fascist non PNAC supporter, now would we?
|
| Newsjock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-11-04 03:02 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Tom Ridge got some way-out-of-whack on the succession scale. I'm too lazy to look it up right now, but I'm sure one of you fine patriots will.
|
| Cat Atomic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-11-04 03:04 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Hell, that's just self-defense. |
|
Would you ever want to give Donald Rumsfeld an incentive to go Hinkley? :P
|
| unblock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-11-04 06:34 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. that would require a constitutional amendment |
|
the reich is not there yet, they're limited now to ignoring the constitution for the time being.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Mon Jan 20th 2025, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
