|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
RedEagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-04 03:41 PM Original message |
BBV: Washington State- Important Olympia Meeting 1/14 !!!! |
Senate Government Operations & Elections Committe
Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 1:30pm Senate Hearing Rm 3 J.A. Cherberg Building Olympia, WA Public Hearing: Voter verified paper trail for electronic voting (Z-0903/04). Map of capital campus: http://www.leg.wa.gov/common/maps/campusmap.htm Reed's proposed legislation makes a placating nod to a paper trail but only on precinct systems and it's not required until 2006- waiting until 2006 (sec. 26) negates the immediate need for accountability in elections. Limiting a paper trail to only precinct-based machines means any other system- like Internet- does NOT have to produce a voter verified paper ballot. Lots more questionable stuff in the bill. Washingtonians, please come to Olympia if you can and support efforts by voting activists in Washington State to protect your vote. You can submit a paper presentation to the commmitee, anything from a packet to one sheet, it is your opportunity to address the committee, as time to speak is very short. However, coming to these meetings and being counted and showing up is very important, even if you don't get to speak. There are about 7 committee members, so you need copies for them plus about 1 extra for the committee staff. A couple more extra to hand to the Governor's staff, if present, and press, if present, is a good idea. Let them know we expect legislation that protects voting integrity in Washington. State officials are paid to do what the CITIZENS want. Sam Reed and the State Election department continue to ignore citizen input. It's taken a year just to get his bill, which is copied below, and it makes only a token concession to voter verified paper ballots. Your rally point at Olympia will be John Gideon. Can't miss him, about 6'7", bear of a guy with a beard. People from Washington acitivist groups will be there to help explain the process. If you guys can duplicate what you did at the LWV meeting in Seattle last week, it will DRIVE the message home! ____________________________________________ BILL REQUEST - CODE REVISER'S OFFICE _____________________________________________ BILL REQ. #: Z-0903.5/04 5th draft BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Enhancing integrity of voting systems. 1 AN ACT Relating to voting systems; amending RCW 29A.12.020, 2 29A.12.050, 29A.12.060, 29A.12.070, 29A.12.080, 29A.12.090, 29A.12.100, 3 29A.12.110, 29A.12.130, 29A.12.150, 29A.44.320, and 29A.60.060; adding 4 a new section to chapter 29A.12 RCW; adding new sections to chapter 5 29A.44 RCW; adding new sections to chapter 29A.60 RCW; adding a new 6 section to chapter 29A.84 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 29A.04 7 RCW; creating a new section; prescribing penalties; providing effective 8 dates; and providing an expiration date. 9 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: 10 Sec. 1. RCW 29A.12.020 and 2003 c 111 s 302 are each amended to 11 read as follows: 12 The secretary of state shall inspect, evaluate, ((and)) publicly 13 demonstrate, and test all voting systems or components of voting 14 systems that are submitted for review under RCW 29A.12.030. The 15 secretary of state shall determine whether the voting systems conform 16 with all of the requirements of this title, the applicable rules 17 adopted in accordance with this title, and with generally accepted 18 safety requirements. The secretary of state shall post the report of 19 certification to a publicly available electronic medium and transmit 1 ((a copy of the report of any examination)) notice of certification 2 under this section, within thirty days after completing the 3 examination, to the county auditor of each county. 4 Sec. 2. RCW 29A.12.050 and 2003 c 111 s 305 are each amended to 5 read as follows: 6 ((If)) Only voting systems or devices or vote tallying systems 7 ((are to)) that have been certified by the secretary of state may be 8 used for conducting a primary or election ((, only those that have the 9 approval of the secretary of state or had been approved under this 10 chapter or the former chapter 29.34 RCW before March 22, 1982, may be 11 used. Any)). No modification, change, redesign, or improvement may be 12 made to any voting system or component of a system ((that does not 13 impair its accuracy, efficiency, or capacity or extend its function, 14 may be made)) without notification of the secretary of state for 15 reexamination or reapproval by the secretary of state under RCW 16 29A.12.020. 17 Sec. 3. RCW 29A.12.060 and 2003 c 111 s 306 are each amended to 18 read as follows: 19 The county auditor of a county in which voting systems are used is 20 responsible for the preparation, maintenance, and operation of those 21 systems and during the logic and accuracy test, must provide written, 22 signed verification that the system and its component software, in the 23 version used, are certified. The auditor may employ and direct persons 24 to perform some or all of these functions. 25 Sec. 4. RCW 29A.12.070 and 2003 c 111 s 307 are each amended to 26 read as follows: 27 An agreement to purchase or lease a voting system or a component of 28 a voting system is subject to that system or component passing an 29 acceptance test, conducted by the county auditor as purchaser or 30 lessee, sufficient to demonstrate that the equipment is the same as 31 that certified by the secretary of state and that the equipment is 32 operating correctly as delivered to the county. 33 Sec. 5. RCW 29A.12.080 and 2003 c 111 s 308 are each amended to 34 read as follows: 1 No voting device ((shall)) or its component software may be 2 ((approved)) certified by the secretary of state unless it: 3 (1) Secures to the voter secrecy in the act of voting; 4 (2) Permits the voter to vote for any person for any office and 5 upon any measure that he or she has the right to vote for; 6 (3) Permits the voter to vote for all the candidates of one party 7 or in part for the candidates of one or more other parties; 8 (4) Correctly registers all votes cast for any and all persons and 9 for or against any and all measures; 10 (5) Provides that a vote for more than one candidate cannot be cast 11 by one single operation of the voting device or vote tally system 12 except when voting for president and vice president of the United 13 States; ((and)) 14 (6) In the case of a precinct-based electronic voting system, at 15 the time of voting produces a machine countable paper record for each 16 vote that may be reviewed by the voter before finalizing his or her 17 vote, as a part of the voting process; and 18 (7) Except for functions or capabilities unique to this state, has 19 been tested((, certified, and used in at least one other state or 20 election jurisdiction)) and approved by the appropriate independent 21 testing authority approved by the federal election assistance 22 commission or its statutory successor. 23 Sec. 6. RCW 29A.12.090 and 2003 c 111 s 309 are each amended to 24 read as follows: 25 The ballot ((on a single voting device shall)) displayed to a voter 26 may not contain the names of candidates for the offices of United 27 States representative, state senator, state representative, county 28 council, or county commissioner in more than one district. ((In all 29 general elections, primaries, and special elections, in each polling 30 place the voting devices containing ballots for candidates from each 31 congressional, legislative, or county council or commissioner district 32 shall be grouped together and physically separated from those devices 33 containing ballots for other districts. Each voter shall be directed 34 by the precinct election officers to the correct group of voting 35 devices.)) 1 Sec. 7. RCW 29A.12.100 and 2003 c 111 s 310 are each amended to 2 read as follows: 3 The secretary of state ((shall)) may not approve a vote tallying 4 system or system software unless it: 5 (1) Correctly counts votes on ballots on which the proper number of 6 votes have been marked for any office or issue; 7 (2) Ignores votes marked for any office or issue where more than 8 the allowable number of votes have been marked, but correctly counts 9 the properly voted portions of the ballot; 10 (3) Accumulates a count of the specific number of ballots tallied 11 for each precinct, total votes by candidate for each office, and total 12 votes for and against each issue of the ballot in that precinct; 13 (4) Accommodates rotation of candidates' names on the ballot under 14 RCW 29A.36.140; 15 (5) Produces precinct and cumulative totals in printed form; and 16 (6) Except for functions or capabilities unique to this state, has 17 been tested((, certified, and used in at least one other state or 18 election jurisdiction)) and approved by the appropriate independent 19 testing authority approved by the federal election assistance 20 commission or its statutory successor. 21 Sec. 8. RCW 29A.12.110 and 2003 c 111 s 311 are each amended to 22 read as follows: 23 In preparing a voting device for a primary or election, a record 24 ((shall)) must be made of the ballot format installed in each device 25 and the precincts or portion of a precinct for which that device has 26 been prepared. Except where provided by a rule adopted under RCW 27 29A.04.610, after being prepared for a primary or election, each device 28 ((shall)) must be sealed with a uniquely numbered seal and provided to 29 the inspector of the appropriate polling place. 30 Sec. 9. RCW 29A.12.130 and 2003 c 111 s 313 are each amended to 31 read as follows: 32 At least three days before each state primary or general election, 33 the office of the secretary of state shall provide for the conduct of 34 tests of the programming for each vote tallying system to be used at 35 that primary or general election. The test must verify that the system 36 will correctly count the vote cast for all candidates and on all 1 measures appearing on the ballot at that primary or general election. 2 The test ((shall)) must verify the capability of the vote tallying 3 system to perform all of the functions that can reasonably be expected 4 to occur during conduct of that particular primary or election. If any 5 error is detected, the cause ((shall)) must be determined and 6 corrected, and an errorless total ((shall)) must be produced before the 7 primary or election. 8 Such tests ((shall)) must be observed by at least one 9 representative from each major political party, if representatives have 10 been appointed by the respective major political parties and are 11 present at the test, and ((shall)) must be open to candidates, the 12 press, and the public. The county auditor and any political party 13 observers shall certify that the test has been conducted in accordance 14 with this section. The county auditor must provide signed, written 15 verification that the version of the voting system and software used 16 are state certified. Copies of this verification and the test 17 certification ((shall)) must be retained by the secretary of state and 18 the county auditor. All programming materials, test results, and test 19 ballots ((shall)) must be securely ((sealed)) stored until the day of 20 the primary or general election. All ballot counting equipment must be 21 sealed, kept in a secure location, and protected against unauthorized 22 access until election day. 23 Sec. 10. RCW 29A.12.150 and 2003 c 111 s 315 are each amended to 24 read as follows: 25 (1) No voting device or machine may be used ((in a county with a 26 population of seventy thousand or more)) to conduct a primary or 27 general or special election in this state unless it correctly records 28 on a separate ballot the votes cast by each elector for any person and 29 for or against any measure and such separate ballots are available for 30 audit purposes after such a primary or election. After January 1, 31 2006, no voting device or machine may be used to conduct a primary or 32 general or special election that uses punched holes to record the 33 voter's choices. 34 (2) The secretary of state shall not certify under this title any 35 voting device or machine for use in conducting a primary or general or 36 special election in this state unless the device or machine correctly 37 records on a separate ballot the votes cast by each elector for any 1 person and for or against any measure and such separate ballots are 2 available for audit purposes after such a primary or election. The 3 secretary of state may not certify under this title any voting device 4 or machine for use in conducting a primary or general or special 5 election that uses punched holes to record the voter's choices. 6 NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. A new section is added to chapter 29A.12 7 RCW to read as follows: 8 The secretary of state may withdraw the certification of any voting 9 system hardware, software, or system component for cause. Before 10 withdrawing a certification the secretary of state shall conduct a 11 public hearing intended to document and allow input from affected 12 system users and vendors before rendering a decision. The secretary of 13 state shall post the report of withdrawal of certification to a 14 publicly available electronic medium and transmit notice of withdrawal 15 of certification under this section to each county auditor within ten 16 days after completing the examination. 17 Sec. 12. RCW 29A.44.320 and 2003 c 111 s 1130 are each amended to 18 read as follows: 19 Whenever poll-site ballot counting devices or poll-site based 20 electronic voting devices are used, the devices may either be included 21 with the supplies required in RCW 29A.44.110 or they may be delivered 22 to the polling place separately. All poll-site ballot counting devices 23 and poll-site based electronic voting devices must be sealed with a 24 unique numbered seal at the time of final preparation and logic and 25 accuracy testing. The seal must secure against unauthorized access. 26 A log must be made of all seal numbers and device numbers used. 27 NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. A new section is added to chapter 29A.44 28 RCW to read as follows: 29 Before each state primary or general election logic and accuracy 30 testing of precinct-based systems or electronic voting devices must be 31 performed by the county under the observation of the office of the 32 secretary of state during the process of final preparation before 33 system distribution to each pollsite. For all other elections the 34 logic and accuracy test must be performed by the county auditor before 35 system distribution. As each ballot counter or electronic voting 1 system is programmed and set up for distribution a logic and accuracy 2 test must be performed. These tests must establish that each system is 3 functioning within system standards. All ballot styles programmed for 4 each machine must be processed by each machine in order to ensure that 5 the machine is correctly counting and accumulating votes for every 6 office. After all tests are performed and the machine is ready for 7 distribution, the machine must be sealed and the seal number recorded. 8 The procedure described in this section will serve as the official 9 logic and accuracy test of these devices. 10 NEW SECTION. Sec. 14. A new section is added to chapter 29A.44 11 RCW to read as follows: 12 A log must be created during the testing of poll-site based ballot 13 counters and electronic voting devices. The log must record the time 14 and place of each test, the precinct number, seal number, and machine 15 number of each ballot counter or voting device, and the initials of 16 each person testing and observing the test for each machine. This log 17 must be included in the official logic and accuracy test materials. 18 The processes described in section 13 of this act must be open to 19 observation and subject to all notices and observers under rules 20 adopted by the secretary of state. 21 NEW SECTION. Sec. 15. A new section is added to chapter 29A.44 22 RCW to read as follows: 23 (1) The secretary of state shall empanel a task force of elections 24 and computer security experts to be known as the "Washington Voting 25 Systems Board" to study and determine the potential for election fraud 26 as follows: 27 (a) At least six county auditors, or their designees, with five 28 years or more of elections experience; 29 (b) At least four computer experts with five years or more 30 experience in maintaining the security of enterprise level computing 31 systems; 32 (c) The director of the department of information services or a 33 designee; 34 (d) The state director of elections or a designee; 35 (e) A representative of the Washington disability access group; Code Rev/GR:mos 7 Z-0903.5/04 5th draft 1 (f) The secretary of state, or a designee, who shall chair the task 2 force. 3 (2) The secretary of state shall provide reports to the legislature 4 before the beginning of the 2005 and 2006 legislative sessions 5 detailing: 6 (a) The progress of the federal election assistance commission in 7 developing standards for the testing, certification, decertification, 8 and recertification of voting system hardware and software, including 9 electronic voting systems; 10 (b) The progress of the federal election assistance commission in 11 conducting a thorough study of the issues and challenges, specifically 12 to include the potential for election fraud; 13 (c) The findings of the secretary of state and the Washington 14 voting systems board on the comparative security of various voting 15 systems technologies; 16 (d) The findings of the secretary of state as to any potential or 17 known risks of voting fraud, or actual instance of voting fraud during 18 the previous year; 19 (e) A list of the voting system technologies certified for use in 20 this state. 21 (3) Subsection (2) of this section expires July 1, 2006. 22 NEW SECTION. Sec. 16. A new section is added to chapter 29A.44 23 RCW to read as follows: 24 All poll-site based electronic voting devices shall produce an 25 individual paper record, at the time of voting, that may be reviewed by 26 the voter before finalizing his or her vote. This record may not be 27 removed from the polling place and must be machine readable for 28 counting purposes. If the device is programmed to display the ballot 29 in multiple languages, the paper record produced must be printed in the 30 language used by each voter. 31 NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. A new section is added to chapter 29A.44 32 RCW to read as follows: 33 Paper records produced by poll-site based electronic voting devices 34 are subject to all of the requirements of this chapter and chapter 35 29A.60 RCW for ballot handling, preservation, reconciliation, transit 1 to the counting center, and storage. The paper records must be 2 preserved in the same manner and for the same period of time as 3 ballots. 4 NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. A new section is added to chapter 29A.44 5 RCW to read as follows: 6 The electronic record produced and counted by poll-site electronic 7 voting devices is the official record of each vote for election 8 purposes. The paper record produced under section 16 of this act must 9 be stored and maintained for use only in the following specified 10 circumstances: 11 (1) In the event of a mandatory hand recount of votes under RCW 12 29A.64.020; 13 (2) In the event of a requested recount under RCW 29A.64.010; 14 (3) By order of the county canvassing board; and 15 (4) By order of the superior court of a county. 16 NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. A new section is added to chapter 29A.44 17 RCW to read as follows: 18 A voter voting on a poll-site based electronic voting system may 19 not leave the device during the voting process except to verify his or 20 her ballot, or to request assistance from the precinct election 21 officers, until the voting process is completed. Except for disabled 22 or visually impaired persons, each voter using a poll-site based 23 electronic voting system is limited to ten minutes voting time 24 including verification of a paper record produced by the system. 25 NEW SECTION. Sec. 20. A new section is added to chapter 29A.60 26 RCW to read as follows: 27 Ballot counting systems must be secured physically and 28 electronically against unauthorized access. Ballot counting systems 29 must not be connected to, or operated on, any electronic network 30 including internal office networks, the Internet, or the World Wide 31 Web. Wireless communications may not be used in any way in a voting 32 system. A network may be used as an internal, integral part of the 33 ballot counting system, but that network must not be connected to any 34 other network, the Internet, or the World Wide Web. All elements of 35 the ballot counting system must be observable and secured. Transfer of 1 information from the ballot counting system to another system for 2 network connection or broadcast must be made via disk, tape, or other 3 physical means of communication other than direct electronic 4 connection. 5 NEW SECTION. Sec. 21. A new section is added to chapter 29A.60 6 RCW to read as follows: 7 Before the first ballot counting session in each election, a report 8 must be produced demonstrating that the system contains no vote data 9 before commencement of counting ballots. At the completion of each 10 ballot counting session, the ballot counting system must produce a 11 report of the results compiled that includes date and time information. 12 Before commencing any additional ballot counting session, a report of 13 the results contained in the system must be produced that includes date 14 and time information. This report must be compared with the report 15 produced at the end of the previous ballot counting session to ensure 16 that no changes have been made to the vote data in the interim period. 17 This comparison must be performed in the presence of political party 18 observers if representatives have been appointed by their respective 19 political parties and are present at the time of comparison. This 20 procedure must be employed for subsequent counting sessions. Nothing 21 in this section precludes the county auditor from zeroing individual 22 devices in subsequent counting sessions if a report is created after 23 each session and before the next, with the results being merged into 24 the total. 25 Sec. 22. RCW 29A.60.060 and 2003 c 111 s 1506 are each amended to 26 read as follows: 27 After the close of the polls, counties employing poll-site ballot 28 counting devices or a remote counting location may telephonically ((or 29 electronically)) transmit the accumulated tally for each device to a 30 central reporting location. Before making a telephonic ((or 31 electronic)) transmission the precinct election officer must create a 32 printed record of the results of the election for that poll site. 33 During the canvassing period the results transmitted telephonically 34 ((or electronically)) must be considered unofficial until a complete 35 reconciliation of the results has been performed. This reconciliation 36 may be accomplished by a direct loading of the results from the memory 1 pack into the central accumulator, or a comparison of the report 2 produced at the poll site on election night with the results received 3 by the central accumulating device. The device or devices used to 4 receive the telephonic transmission may not be directly connected to 5 the voting system. Transfer of the information received must be made 6 via disk, tape, or other physical means of communication other than 7 direct electronic connection. 8 NEW SECTION. Sec. 23. A new section is added to chapter 29A.84 9 RCW to read as follows: 10 Anyone who removes a paper record produced by a poll-site based 11 electronic voting system from a polling place without authorization is 12 guilty of a class C felony punishable under RCW 9A.20.021. 13 NEW SECTION. Sec. 24. A new section is added to chapter 29A.04 14 RCW to read as follows: 15 The secretary of state may adopt administrative rules concerning 16 the operation, conduct of voting, and usage of poll-site based 17 electronic voting devices and paper records. 18 NEW SECTION. Sec. 25. Nothing in this act prevents the state of 19 Washington, its counties, or its voters from participating in the 20 Secure Electronic Registration and Voting Experiment (SERVE) as 21 authorized by PL 107-107, Title 16, section 1604 and chapter 17, Laws 22 of 2003 1st sp. sess. including system certification, voter 23 registration, and voting. 24 NEW SECTION. Sec. 26. Sections 16 through 19 and 23 of this act 25 take effect January 1, 2006, the remainder of this act takes effect 26 July 1, 2004. --- END --- Code Rev/GR:mos 11 Z-0903.5/04 5th draft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedEagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-04 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Help Us Out Wednesday |
Reed's ultimate goal is Internet voting.
He has totally, totally, ignored citizens on this issue. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy_Stephenson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-13-04 02:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Reed is |
clueless
:kick: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnGideon (492 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-04 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yep! I'll be there. |
I have a meeting at 1PM with one of my Reps. but I will be there as soon as I can after that meeting.
Let's have a good showing of people and show them that we really do care about our vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-13-04 06:02 AM Response to Original message |
4. bump |
n/t
|
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedEagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-13-04 10:12 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Wednesday, Olympia, because it's VERY important |
Show support for citizens bill on voting systems.
Sam Reed "talks" but does not deliver. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC