Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Daily Howler Skewers Maureen Dowd

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 11:31 AM
Original message
Daily Howler Skewers Maureen Dowd
He's been a bit tough on Dean, but Bob Somerby is much tougher on idiots like Dowd.


http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh011504.shtml

HER WIRES ARE SHOWING: In a million years, you couldn’t invent them. In this morning’s New York Times, Maureen Dowd casts a troubled eye on Howard Dean’s deeply troubling marriage. “Even by the transcendentally wacky standard for political unions set by Bill and Hillary Clinton, the Deans have an unusual relationship,” she says. But just what makes the Deans’ marriage so “wacky?” Dean’s wife “has never even been to Iowa,” Dowd grouses. Nor is she likely to show up there, the scribe says, “since she prefers examining patients to being cross-examined by voters and reporters.” Imagine! Dean’s wife would rather heal the sick than spend time with people like Dowd!

Wires beginning to poke through her skin, Dowd—inevitably—was soon talking wardrobe. She cites “a startling picture of wife on the front page of Tuesday’s Times.” And what was so “startling” about that photo? The clothing! What else really matters?

DOWD: In worn jeans and old sneakers, the shy and retiring Dr. Judith Steinberg Dean looked like a crunchy Vermont hippie, blithely uncoiffed, unadorned, unstyled and unconcerned about not being at her husband’s side—the anti-Laura. You could easily imagine the din of Rush Limbaugh and Co. demonizing her as a counterculture fem-lib role model for the blue states.

For the record, why did Dean look “unconcerned about not being at her husband’s side?” Perhaps because she was at his side. Here’s the caption beneath that photo: “Dr. Judith Steinberg Dean, right, watching her husband, Howard Dean, at a debate on Nov. 4.” For Dowd, the photo of Dean’s disturbing old shoes spoke louder than all those dumb words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. What in the world could she have
written if she had half a brain. Surely she could have written a positive peace on the role of women in modern times who truly represent the women of today who don't have the "stand by your man complex" and in reality the economy will not allow this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Or she could have written that if the United States wants
the unpaid labor of a First Lady, it might consider offering benefits, like legal use of the White House lawyer, etc.

Why should she leave a useful job to become a slave?

What, pray tell, are the benefits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. She's as bad as or worse than all of those delicate dipshits
like Sally "Our Town" Quinn at the Washington Post who all cry "Who moved my cheese!" when "outsiders" take power in town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. The first Crunchy Granola First Lady
Bring it on! I think she's fabulous. Read the People interview with both of them. They are a lovely, loving couple. The thing is, they are a lot like most of us. Their relationship is contemporary and normal. It's the Stepford Laura Bush who is an anachronism. Who lives like that? Who DRESSES like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's what I love about her. I know couples just like them.
They're no less loving for having separate careers. People who can't deal with that need royalty in the White House. Screw royalty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I love this story in the People interview
They were always fighting about the phone bill and the heating bill, because he thought she should stop turning up the heat all the time, and she thought he should stop running up the phone bill. So they solved it. She pays the heating bill, he pays the phone bill, the other person doesn't look at the bill, and everyone's happy. THIS is the kind of problem-solving I want to see in a first couple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dowd gives PMS a bad name.
She's like the reincarnation of Joan Rivers. Who is okay if you don't mind that catty, intelligent, but practically useless kind of person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Dowd may have some kind of hidden attributes but
hers appears to be nothing more than a wasted life. Can you imagine being in the position to encourage positive change, and instead, using that powerful voice for such inane- even destructive- banter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. I bet his wife even thinks for herself!
Bad news for Dean! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. It Couldn't Happen to a Nicer Person
Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here's something from the Dean website....
that (sort of) addresses this issue:

*snip*

Judy Dean is a historical anomaly among political wives – the stand-by-your-man spouses who drop their own careers at the first whiff of a presidential run and devote themselves solely to their husband's election. She has instead opted to continue seeing patients who, as she put it in a recent fundraising letter, "want and need to see a physician who knows them when they're ill."

*snip*

And a pic:



Sorry Ms. Dowd, WRONG!!!

Love,

Foamdad

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. It galls me that she's NYT only regular female columnist
Of all of the women on the planet, we get a middle-aged Heather who chatters away about affairs, hair color, metrosexuals, and whatever else flashes briefly across her 5 second attention span.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldcoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Cordelia Chase
Her editorial reminded me of Cordelia Chase for the first couple of seasons of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." The one difference is Cordelia eventually grew up. It is a shame that we can not say the same about Dowd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC