Should O'neill and Wilson show up at the State of the Union Address?
wuushew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 05:33 PM
Original message |
| Should O'neill and Wilson show up at the State of the Union Address? |
|
Would it help or hurt us?
|
| eyeontheprize
(331 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Help, but that's a pretty tight list. |
|
There will be a wounded soldier. A WTC survivor. Some Arab for Christ.
No room for anyone else.
|
| ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Need a Mexican in there somewhere, but the soldier will probably be black anyway .....
|
| TheDalaiMama
(159 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 11. Only people missing are "Cowpokes for Christ" |
|
I would love to see some dissing of shrub at the SOTU but the folks there won't do it. Too much to lose.
dalai
|
| Jacobin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. It's not open to the public |
| KissMyAsscroft
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Not anything we can do... |
|
The SOTU is sacred ground for a sitting pres. None of Clinton's were interrupted so it would be in poor taste for any political statements to be made by us. Even if we could, it would backfire big time.
Just gonna have to grin and bear it and refute the lies afterwards.
|
| wuushew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. I didn't say anything about disruption |
|
the fact that they would be there while he repeated proven lies would hopefully generate buzz in the press.
|
| mike1963
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Well, I'll bet a thousand bucks against a cold cup of coffee they ain't |
| mlawson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Yes, as guests of Senator Kennedy. |
|
Now, as to whetherthe media would recognize them to the TV audience, that is a different question.
|
| JohnOneillsMemory
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. and Rand Beers, Karen Kwiatkowski, Coleen Rowley. Just sitting. Yes! |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-19-04 05:49 PM by JohnOneillsMemory
The camera coverage of them not applauding, just shaking their heads. Great image...commentators explaining who they were.
|
| bobbieinok
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. you sure do trust the media |
|
no view, no explanation EVER
|
| heidiho
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. YES, flanking Laura Bush (she won't know who they are) |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Mon Jan 20th 2025, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
