Wow.. I am glad to see that there are some following responses
to this issue. I know, there was a somewhat important event
that took place within the party last night but..
The point with Hull is that he WAS in a union. Nancy Skinner -
very pro-labor in her own right - still is . And she has had
to remind others of this when the notion that "Hull is
the only union member" is uttered. And take a stand is
right! I was a union organizer for eight years and I am
surprised myself at times that I still identify as a [very
disgruntled] democrat. The dems always want workers' support
but when time comes for the vote in DC, we are an
afterthought. Thanks for the vote now go away. Maybe Hynes is
just being unintentionally honest in displaying how important
the issues of labor are to some - no actually, many -
politicians.
I realize that a lot of people think that Nancy has no chance
of winning... if people refuse to pay attention to her, if the
media ignores her, it makes it more difficult. And it is not a
surprise to me that the media - especially Chicago- has barely
made any mention of her. This is a woman who stood up to WLS -
disney owned, rush limbaugh loving entity that it is - and
maintained her political stance even though doing so
jeopardized her job.
Sometimes it just shocks me as to how COMPLETELY lacking and
biased the media is. I mean, even beyond the right wing
corporate slant that is so transparent to those of us who
actually avoid Fox News et. al. The Tribune posted a general
profile of the Senate candidates in the Sunday paper a few
weeks ago. The men were all mentioned and described in terms
of their careers, political experience etc. Maria Pappas's
long time service in the city was so minimally mentioned that
it should have been the most infuriating part of her profile.
No, the "she carries a dog around in her purse, she is a
bit eccentric, blah, blah," dominated the remaining
portrait. Nancy and Joyce were mentioned- just named!- in the
last sentence in the last paragraph. I was compelled to write
to the Trib on that one, not just on behalf of Nancy but for
all of the candidates, specifically the women. It is still
such a male centered world - and I do not intend to demean the
male candidates; it is unfortunately a fact, one more obstacle
that Skinner must face.
If everything is to be examined, I think that Nancy's opinions
on the issues are much more closely related to the majority of
those expressed on DU. Read her platform: Nancy has the luxury
of not being a party regular, nor a beneficiary of all that
such a relationship may lend. This gives her a freedom that
none of the other candidates have - a good thing, I believe.
And she can win. The voting pool in the primary election is
small enough that, with so many candidates and so many voters
who remain undecided, anyone truly can win.
By the way, there is a debate tomorrow night in Evanston
[Northwestern, Ryan Auditorium, 2145 Sheridan Rd, 7 p.m.] ;
Obama, Chico, Pappas, Hynes, Washington, and, of course,
Skinner, will be participating. I will be attending.. I am
curious if anyone else will.
Also, as I stated in my first post, I would really like to
start a group/forum that exclusively discusses this race.
Anyone interested and if so, would you please assist me in
this process? I am a Skinner loyalist, have spent many hours
volunteering and supporting her effort. The nice thing about
such a small, determined campaign is that I actually can speak
with Nancy on a regular basis, and see her almost every day
that I am in the office. Such a situation makes the process so
much more realistic, and true than otherwise. If Nancy does
not win the primary I am voting for the winner... no
hesitation. To live in a state with two democratic US
Senators.....!!! So I would love to keep a discussion going on
this issue, and I hope others agree. Bye bye Fitzgerald and
bring on the repugs; especially Ryan and his unfortunate last
name!!