To those fighting for the rights of homosexuals, the president's election-year remarks formed part of an aggressively homophobic agenda which seeks to
push US gays and lesbians to the fringes of society. But by refusing to endorse an immediate constitutional ban on gay marriage nor ruling out "civil unions" for homosexuals, Mr Bush hoped to keep on board that all important electoral group - the middle ground.
There is indeed a difference between marriage - which is accompanied by a range of rights enshrined in law - and civil union - which comes with protections defined by the state in question, a distinction Mr Bush is keen to stress.
This statement has been interpreted as leaving the door open for the kind of arrangements Vermont has made for its homosexual residents - but
Mr Bush was quite clear that should Massachusetts push ahead with gay marriage, he would act."If necessary, I will support a constitutional amendment which would honour marriage between a man and a woman, codify that." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3416025.stm